šŸˆ 5 reasons Georgia will be this offseason’s media darling

alagator

Verified Member
Member
In the dog days of summer, the college football landscape is barren except for the voices of those forced to conjure up storylines from the same information that has been available for most of the year.

With so little actual news to talk about, the conversation inevitably turns to predictions about the upcoming season and why teams are actually better or worse than they really are. It’s during this discussion that the media begin to jump aboard a team’s bandwagon like fleas latching onto the nearest animal they can find.

We are all guilty of doing this to some extent. Every person has a unique reason they believe a team is overrated or not getting the credit they deserve. One fan may value experience over anything else, while another thinks a strong defense is the only way to succeed.

Most media darlings don’t come out of left field. They often have several qualities that should make a good team. Tennessee possessed more experience than nearly anyone in college football last season, and Auburn was believed to be just a quarterback away in 2015.

What’s interesting about media darlings is that most of them contain at least one potentially fatal flaw. Those flaws get minimized, however, as people tout the reasons why a team could be a contender. It’s not often that such a team actually meets expectations.

The Bulldogs aren’t without question marks, but they do have plenty of reasons for optimism.

All signs point to Georgia becoming this year’s preseason pick of choice. Here are the five biggest reasons.

The youth movement should be further along: In 2016, the Bulldogs had a ceiling. With a true freshman quarterback, an All-SEC running back coming off a devastating knee injury and a first-time head coach, it would have taken everything going right for Georgia to reach double-digit victories.

What’s crazy about that, however, is that the Bulldogs weren’t far from accomplishing that. They played in six games that were decided by three points or less and went 3-3 in such contests. If things go right, Georgia could have conceivably finished with 11 wins. Nobody really believes that last year’s team was an 11-win squad, but the Bulldogs’ ceiling is much higher this year.

Jacob Eason is no longer experiencing everything for the first time, and he should be more capable in his sophomore season. Georgia’s inexperienced defense last season has become a true strength under Kirby Smart. The Bulldogs have some interesting young pieces in the passing game, and a budding star in tight end Isaac Nauta.

With last year’s experience to fall back on, Georgia should be better equipped to come out on top of those close games.

Brand-name talent: It’s difficult to be an expert on every single team in the SEC or to know each program as intimately as a fan does. For this reason, national media pundits are more likely to favor known commodities. One of the most-improved groups from this point last year is South Carolina. The Gamecocks have true upset abilities, but they have few established stars and likely won’t get the same level of attention this preseason.

Georgia, on the other hand, has several players who are known across the nation. Nick Chubb, Sony Michel, Jacob Eason, Lorenzo Carter and Trent Thompson are all players media figures can point to as reasons the Bulldogs are a major threat. They aren’t wrong, Georgia does return a strong amount of veteran talent, but that doesn’t guarantee future success.

Perception of the SEC East: Predictions for the SEC East in 2017 aren’t likely to be much different from 2016. Most will probably say they expect the division to be a three-team race between Georgia, Florida and Tennessee with the potential for either Kentucky or South Carolina to play spoiler. The trio at the top remains the same, but the perception for each is radically different.

The vast amount of experience that made the Vols favorites entering last season is now gone, and the Gators still don’t have a proven quarterback and continue to lose talented defensive players. Both teams can be viewed as regressing or remaining stagnant, while Georgia is very much considered a team on the rise.

Kirby Smart is no longer a rookie: Believing that experience and success have a direct, positive correlation is a trap we all fall into. Just because someone isn’t seeing things for the first time doesn’t mean he or she will make the right decisions the second time around. Nevertheless, Smart should be improved as a head coach in his second season, even if only slightly.

The narrative that Smart will grow alongside his team is perfectly packaged, and it’s easy to use as an explanation for how the Bulldogs will jump from eight wins to 10 or 11.

Georgia is a premier program: Georgia has the luxury of belonging to a select group of programs with historical panache. College football blue-bloods will always be given attention, even if it hasn’t achieved national success in a while.

In 2017, the Bulldogs should be as talented any squad to play between the hedges over the past few seasons. When Georgia is good, it’s good for college football. The Bulldogs are a team that people have an opinion about one way or another.

5 reasons Georgia will be this offseason’s media darling
 
Who is going to tear this one apart? Should we start a list that's five things that the media have wrong about Georgia? Or five things wrong in this article?
Right?

Georgia hasn't had "Panache" especially since 08, but really since the 80s. After the first 5 years of Richt, everyone knew he was good for about 2-3 losses a year. He'd beat somebody he wasn't supposed to once a year, but lose 2 or 3 he wasn't supposed to as well. But that's "Panache". Ok...lol
 
What’s crazy about that, however, is that the Bulldogs weren’t far from accomplishing that. They played in six games that were decided by three points or less and went 3-3 in such contests. If things go right, Georgia could have conceivably finished with 11 wins.
Ya know? You just can't use that guy blinking as a reaction to everything.
 
Kirby Smart is no longer a rookie: Believing that experience and success have a direct, positive correlation is a trap we all fall into. Just because someone isn’t seeing things for the first time doesn’t mean he or she will make the right decisions the second time around. Nevertheless, Smart should be improved as a head coach in his second season, even if only slightly.

The narrative that Smart will grow alongside his team is perfectly packaged, and it’s easy to use as an explanation for how the Bulldogs will jump from eight wins to 10 or 11.

Yeah, but oh what a crappy rookie year. I took a look at the season's schedule because I couldn't think of a football game that Georgia overachieved. So maybe the best game I saw was his first right out of the box against North Carolina. Chubbs was running wild and the Dawgs were playing like it mattered and rallied enough to put down a pretty decent team at the time. The flip side of that was much more severe and harsh in evaluating Kirby's rookie foray.

Nicholls State, should have been a home loss, that game didn't scream ready for prime time, or any other time. 26-24 win.
Missouri, another dumpster fire of a game, now back to back. 28-27 win.
Ole Miss, after the last 2 weeks who saw that coming? 45-14 loss and should have been worse.
Tennessee, Hail no, at least they came out fighting for the first time since NC. 34-31 loss
South Carolina, played on a Sunday because of that famous storm, Dawgs completed only 5 forward passes but thank the lord they got them before they found Jake Bentley. 28-14 win
Vandy, Kirby followed up the big road win with a miserable effort at home and just couldn't run the ball again. 17-16 loss.
Florida, Same effort against their hated rival Gators as the guy Kirby replaced and same results. 24-10 loss
Kentucky, a nail-biter that ended with better O and a late, late field goal, hail yeah. 27-24 win.
Barners, Kirby had enough sense to let gus coach himself out of this game, gus didn't disappoint. 13-7 win and it was closer than that.
LA Lafayette, the first time in a while the home crowd didn't have to conjure the spirit of Uga I in the great dawg pound beyond for the victory. 35-21 win.
Georgia Tech, Kirby again was able to duplicate only what Richt accomplished the last time the Jackets visited Sanford Stadium, a loss to the Ramblin Wreck. 31-23. Better learn this rival thing.

I really wasn't impressed with Kirby at all after the NC opening game. What they could do one week they got nothing the next. I was actually pulling for him more than he deserved. He better right this ship cause one more campaign like that and he'll be upgrading his DC resume.
 
I really wasn't impressed with Kirby at all after the NC opening game.
Chalk me in the category of not being impressed before, during, or after the NC game.

This one paragraph from the recap on ESPN summed up that game if not their season:

"It felt really weird," Smart said, chuckling. "A comedy of errors. I had to flip over on my headphones, trying to figure out who I was talking to. That was different for me. I was trying to find the special teams. I didn't feel like I was coaching my players, which I always felt was my best asset. It was a unique experience for me that I will build on and learn from."
If there was one thing I thought Smart would walk away from Tuscaloosa with it was the ability to stay on top of small things--the structure found in Saban's system that everyone said Smart would take to Athens. I've seen more than a few try to excuse that "comedy of errors" by stating "it was a neutral site game, that's too be expected." Err, things like that are handled in this thing he's seen for a decade called a walk-through.

Chubbs was running wild and the Dawgs were playing like it mattered and rallied enough to put down a pretty decent team at the time. The flip side of that was much more severe and harsh in evaluating Kirby's rookie foray.

Chubb did get his yards rushing but I have to weigh that against now UNC fell apart in the fourth quarter. A few PI's, a couple of unsportsmanlike penalities (maybe just one, I do recall Fedora getting flagged,) a safety ...

In my eyes, calling that fourth quarter a "rally" by UGA is akin to saying Coming to America was a Oscar worthy film when its only competition was Johnny Be Good.

-----

Faust is a good name to use for UGA this year when talking about Kirby. Faust, and not because he's going to emulate the famed magicians acts in the book series.
 
UGA...lives in a State of some of the best talent in America....
One of the most underachieving CF programs....
Has the state to themselves (come on...GT dont count....gee that's one of the most prestigious engineering schools)...
Feel free to insert LSU where I put UGA and sub Tulane n medical for GT n engineering......
....And they are NOT a premier program...period!
...And the SECeast is weak...and mediocre....
And Kirby...will be fine...He is not a FAUST....who came outta High School ball... Beingthe MAN is different and some adjust slower...
And a 10 win season for UGA is onthe horizon....period
 
Has the state to themselves (come on...GT dont count....gee that's one of the most prestigious engineering schools)...
With UGA losing two of its last three against Tech there are a lot of UGA fans who certainly count those losses.

When it comes to recruiting there is a difference in the players the two teams recruit. When it comes to the state of each program there's little difference right now (except GT fans are more realistic on what to expect.)
 
UGA...lives in a State of some of the best talent in America....
One of the most underachieving CF programs....
Has the state to themselves (come on...GT dont count....gee that's one of the most prestigious engineering schools)...
Feel free to insert LSU where I put UGA and sub Tulane n medical for GT n engineering......
....And they are NOT a premier program...period!
...And the SECeast is weak...and mediocre....
And Kirby...will be fine...He is not a FAUST....who came outta High School ball... Beingthe MAN is different and some adjust slower...
And a 10 win season for UGA is onthe horizon....period

I don't know about 10 wins!

App State- should be a W, but that Nicholls State game last year!:shock:
@ Notre Dame- likely a L
Samford - W
Miss State- L I think they struggle with Fitzgerald the QB for State
@ Tennessee- L Viles don't need a Hail Mary this time
@ Vandy- W Vandy offense will continue to struggle to find points
Missouri- W Mizzou struggling
BYE WEEK
Florida- L If Franks is indeed the QB for UF, McElwain will find success
South Carolina- Toss up!! Can USCe find continued success with Jake Bentley at QB? If so, watch out Dawgs!
@ Auburn- Toss up!! Will Kirby play it close to the vest and allow Gustav to coach the Tigers to the L or will Stidham the proclaimed messiah on the plains spell Doom for the Dawgs?
Kentucky- W but close!! Could this be the signature win for Stoops? He came pretty close last season.
Georgia Tech- Toss up!! Not only a rivalry but that damn triple option is a bitch to prepare for in a week!!!
 
Chalk me in the category of not being impressed before, during, or after the NC game.

This one paragraph from the recap on ESPN summed up that game if not their season:

"It felt really weird," Smart said, chuckling. "A comedy of errors. I had to flip over on my headphones, trying to figure out who I was talking to. That was different for me. I was trying to find the special teams. I didn't feel like I was coaching my players, which I always felt was my best asset. It was a unique experience for me that I will build on and learn from."
If there was one thing I thought Smart would walk away from Tuscaloosa with it was the ability to stay on top of small things--the structure found in Saban's system that everyone said Smart would take to Athens. I've seen more than a few try to excuse that "comedy of errors" by stating "it was a neutral site game, that's too be expected." Err, things like that are handled in this thing he's seen for a decade called a walk-through.



Chubb did get his yards rushing but I have to weigh that against now UNC fell apart in the fourth quarter. A few PI's, a couple of unsportsmanlike penalities (maybe just one, I do recall Fedora getting flagged,) a safety ...

In my eyes, calling that fourth quarter a "rally" by UGA is akin to saying Coming to America was a Oscar worthy film when its only competition was Johnny Be Good.

-----

Faust is a good name to use for UGA this year when talking about Kirby. Faust, and not because he's going to emulate the famed magicians acts in the book series.

Actually, I don't think that the dawgs were all that in the NC game. But they showed a little grit and resolve and Chubbs coming off a bad injury looked impressive. I really expected Kirby to build off of some positive things and improve each week, cause that's what good coaches do. They just didn't even with 2 potential NFL running backs leading the way. Looks like Kirby got his juniors to reenlist and he has better overall talent, plus more depth at DL and better players at OL. I like Pittman as an OL coach and Chaney has been around, Mel Tucker has to show better with better players and not sure about DL coach since Rocker was fired for arguing with Aubrey Solomon's mother. What a crock and what a crappy excuse for a recruit. Kirby doesn't have a bad staff. The acid test will be game 2 in South Bend. If the struggle ends up being the 1st game, all bets are off.
 
I really expected Kirby to build off of some positive things and improve each week, cause that's what good coaches do.
There's problem number #1--nothing to give any indication that Kirby is a good coach. A lot to give indications he's a good coordinator, bad head coach.
and Chaney has been around,
...and every offense he's coordinated has taken a downturn when he's in control. We saw it in '09 to '10 with UT (and credit goes to Lane for '09.) We saw it at Arkansas from '13 to '14 (resulting in him not coaching in Fayetteville anymore.) Chaney was at Pitt--one season, he's gone.

A bad year on offense last year for UGA combined with Chaney's track record leads to one conclusion--it's still going to leave a lot of UGA fans wishing for Mark more.
 
There's problem number #1--nothing to give any indication that Kirby is a good coach. A lot to give indications he's a good coordinator, bad head coach.

Real time, real time Terry, I didn't say this after the fact. When one has never been a HC, all one can do is speculate. You really don't like this guy, do you? It's OK, he's not my favorite either.

...and every offense he's coordinated has taken a downturn when he's in control. We saw it in '09 to '10 with UT (and credit goes to Lane for '09.) We saw it at Arkansas from '13 to '14 (resulting in him not coaching in Fayetteville anymore.) Chaney was at Pitt--one season, he's gone.

A bad year on offense last year for UGA combined with Chaney's track record leads to one conclusion--it's still going to leave a lot of UGA fans wishing for Mark more.

Chaney has been around, I would call him serviceable, otherwise, he doesn't get recycled as often as he does as an OC. Pittsburg HC called him an amazing QB guru and he did coach Drew Brees in college, so perhaps he excels off the field as much as on. He has had mixed results at different stops but one advantage he brings as OC besides a ton of experience that Kirby doesn't have, is the different schemes he's had success with, I know a relative term. But he has directed pass-happy offensives and power run Os like at Arkansas.

Kirby has publicly stated about his style he wants to incorporate in Athens, "go get good players and give them the ball." Now that sounds like the Bama way. Chaney has a reputation of building offenses around the teams best players not plug and play into a certain style that the coordinator insists on running.
 
I really expected Kirby to build off of some positive things and improve each week, cause that's what good coaches do.

Real time, real time Terry, I didn't say this after the fact. When one has never been a HC, all one can do is speculate. You really don't like this guy, do you? It's OK, he's not my favorite either.

How much more "real time" can we get? We know his history/resume'. We know what happened, on the field of play, last year with Georgia. It's no stretch, or even a preconceived bias, to say there's nothing that's given any indication he's a good coach. Quite the opposite.

(Seriously. How does a head coach not cover things like the coach's communication in a freakin' walk-through? And he's admitting he couldn't even find his special teams channel?
Lack. Of. Preparation. No other way to put it in my eyes.)

{I'll get back to the other paragraphs in a few. And, it's a run to Ace Hardware instead of Lowe's ... so don't let that upset your Home Depot persona! ;) )
 
@TUSKstuff @BamaFan334 I may have gotten you two confused. Someone was giving me a little hell about Home Depot vs Lowe's a few weeks ago.

Chaney has been around, I would call him serviceable, otherwise, he doesn't get recycled as often as he does as an OC. Pittsburg HC called him an amazing QB guru and he did coach Drew Brees in college, so perhaps he excels off the field as much as on. He has had mixed results at different stops but one advantage he brings as OC besides a ton of experience that Kirby doesn't have, is the different schemes he's had success with, I know a relative term. But he has directed pass-happy offensives and power run Os like at Arkansas.

I've heard "Chaney coached Brees" more times than I can count. I see an issue with that because Brees wasn't that good of a college quarterback. He's respected for what he's done in the NFL. He's was one of your '2'fers' in college: Two TD's, one INT. Two TD's, one INT.

That said, Pitt was one of the first programs in the country to move to the spread offensive scheme. That's a Joe
Tiller coaching move, not something people point to Chaney and say, "look what he did." It's not a lot different than his time at UT where that offense in '09 was Lane's.

We did see improvement with Allen at Arkansas as he got older. Do we give that to Chaney's influence or Arkansas having two guys surpass 1000 yards on the season where one barely eclipsed that number his first year?

Bottom line with me is this is a lot like Kirby and his head coach position--I'm lacking for things to point to in favor of the Chaney factor with UGA this fall.
 
Terry is being cryptic about the color of their buildings. No, I don't work there, but they got a lot of my money. :-)
How cryptic is this? I hate, and avoid, the color orange at any and all costs!!!

My only wish is someone other than HD carried Ryobi...geez, almost an entire wall full their products.
 
Back
Top Bottom