See Post # 56 in this thread.@252BAMA last I heard there were doubts Mizzou's QB was playing this weekend.
I would have been all over Maryland (vs Michigan State) if you had that up. Besides the Tucker issue, MSU has 17 players out for injuries/issues.There's a couple of interesting ML's this week if you're willing to play...
Clemson and UCLA?There's a couple of interesting ML's this week if you're willing to play...
No. But now I have to go look at the ML. I'm guessing with FSU and Clemson being so close that ML is in the 120 area for Clemson. Good value. I don't like Clemson in this game. I don't see them as having the QB or the skill players to match FSU. (That home dog thing, I know...I'm taking FSU at -1½.)Clemson and UCLA?
I don't like Clemson either but if FSU does what they did at BC, they will lose at Clemson. So my thinking is FSU loses rather than Clemson wins.No. But now I have to go look at the ML. I'm guessing with FSU and Clemson being so close that ML is in the 120 area for Clemson. Good value. I don't like Clemson in this game. I don't see them as having the QB or the skill players to match FSU. (That home dog thing, I know...I'm taking FSU at -1½.)
UCLA? Again, see this one differently. UCLA's offense was clicking last week and then we have Utah at home? 51½ looks low. I like Utah at -4½ as well.
I know the value isn't as good as the one's you've mentioned but I'm looking at the other side of this. IE: Iowa State is 10/17, -170. While 17K will pay 10, I'm thinking about 170K.
There's one. #2, and this is a big one for me, is the matchup between Kelly and Scalley. Scalley has put together some good defenses the last few years. TFL's and sacks will stymie a Kelly offense and that's something Utah has pretty well ruled the PAC in for the last four, five years...if not a little longer. Hell, Scalley has been there for 15 or more years...8th or 9th as DC I think.I like UCLA, especially if Rising is still out. Even if it is on the road.
What about CCU? 159K there would pay 60K. Then play with partial house money on Iowa State. Of course you don't have to be concerned with that sitting at close to 1M. I put 53K on CCU.No. But now I have to go look at the ML. I'm guessing with FSU and Clemson being so close that ML is in the 120 area for Clemson. Good value. I don't like Clemson in this game. I don't see them as having the QB or the skill players to match FSU. (That home dog thing, I know...I'm taking FSU at -1½.)
UCLA? Again, see this one differently. UCLA's offense was clicking last week and then we have Utah at home? 51½ looks low. I like Utah at -4½ as well.
I know the value isn't as good as the one's you've mentioned but I'm looking at the other side of this. IE: Iowa State is 10/17, -170. While 17K will pay 10, I'm thinking about 170K.
I like McCall. But I have to weigh that against Ga Southern's defense and I can see an INT, or two. I like Ga Southern's running game when matched against CCU's running defense.What about CCU? 159K there would pay 60K. Then play with partial house money on Iowa State. Of course you don't have to be concerned with that sitting at close to 1M. I put 53K on CCU.
BYU? Sagarin has Kansas at -0.22. Kansas beat Illinois only by 11. They are not going to beat BYU by 10. I like BYU SU. If they can win at Arkansas, they can win at Kansas.There's a couple of interesting ML's this week if you're willing to play...
As it ends up ... after I put the early lines up Monday I took BYU 48 minutes before you did: your first time. Now that the ML's are posted I'm just starting to look back over the games. This is one I'd chalked up as a "look again." I'm playing it again, but this time on the total.BYU? Sagarin has Kansas at -0.22. Kansas beat Illinois only by 11. They are not going to beat BYU by 10. I like BYU SU. If they can win at Arkansas, they can win at Kansas.
I figured the 25K wager on the over was yours. FWIW, Sagarin has this game at 50.47, but I know you said it takes 4 or 5 weeks for his data to start clicking.As it ends up ... after I put the early lines up Monday I took BYU 48 minutes before you did: your first time. Now that the ML's are posted I'm just starting to look back over the games. This is one I'd chalked up as a "look again." I'm playing it again, but this time on the total.
FWIW, I saw where Callahan's SP+ had this one as a 50/50 for a BYU road upset. I thought the total was low when I posted it earlier ... saw his model has this game in the mid-70's.
In my opinion it does most of the time. Right now I'm looking at sample size.FWIW, Sagarin has this game at 50.47, but I know you said it takes 4 or 5 weeks for his data to start clicking.
Line is at 8.5 on the online books.In my opinion it does most of the time. Right now I'm looking at sample size.
Kansas: Mizzou St, Nevada, and Illinois. Illini, maybe? But, it was 34-7 early in the 3rd when Kansas just put on the brakes. I wasn't impressed with Bert's defense.
BYU: Sam Houston, S Utah, and Arkansas.
I'm looking at 66% of the games he's using as a reference ... and what does it tell me? Do I make anything of BYU only putting up 14 on Sam Houston? Or is the 41 against S Utah a clearer picture?
I decided to jump over to Covers to see where the public is heading right now on their site ...
View attachment 25544
8½ across the board on Vi this morning ...Line is at 8.5 on the online books.
forgot abt that post...guess I'm not so cleverI figured the 25K wager on the over was yours. FWIW, Sagarin has this game at 50.47, but I know you said it takes 4 or 5 weeks for his data to start clicking.