Decked out in his customary Marshall basketball t-shirt and a dark blazer, DāAntoni unspooled what he referred to as his ādaggone analytics storyā: āThe last two championships have been Cleveland and Golden State,ā he said, talking about the NBA. āWhat did they do? You donāt see anybody post up. They just spread that thing out and go.ā
DāAntoni became an overnight exemplar of analytics. But can an NBA blueprint remake a mid-major team with subpar talent in the NCAA?
...
āIf you do just the ordinary, youāll lose, so you have to do something unusual to beat people more athletically gifted than you,ā DāAntoni said.
...
And DāAntoni knows all of the percentages. āIāve told our players the numbers forever,ā DāAntoni said. āWhen you look at offense, itās not about the overall scheme ā itās about the actions within an offense, and you have to know the best odds for scoring.ā Using data culled from the NBA, which DāAntoni contended still applies to the college game, a corner 3, which is worth 1.27 points per shot, is the best shot in basketball. The next best shot? āAny other three,ā he said. A lay-up ā āa clean lay-up,ā DāAntoni stresses ā is even better: 1.8 points per shot.1
...
This is related to a thread I posted just before the NIT started about the NCAA using that tournament as an experimental field for rule changes. Among those this year was a difference in the three point line distance.
Here's the NCAA release. I suspect we'll see the line move, soon.
The quotes from above with D'Antoni come from this article:
The DāAntoni Basketball Revolution Goes To College