rgene said:Terry - that link goes to a parent directory. Is that what you intended?
rgene said:Terry - that link goes to a parent directory. Is that what you intended?
TerryP said:rgene said:Terry - that link goes to a parent directory. Is that what you intended?
Hell, I spent almost a good half hour going through some of those links just watching different football scenes.
Any, mine is right, it's a chance to look at the '06 squad, their '07 squad, and see the differences in approaches.
Tider 27 said:TerryP said:rgene said:Terry - that link goes to a parent directory. Is that what you intended?
Hell, I spent almost a good half hour going through some of those links just watching different football scenes.
Any, mine is right, it's a chance to look at the '06 squad, their '07 squad, and see the differences in approaches.
So what do you think Terry? I noticed a good bit of the spread and the I-formation. He have any other formations that we should know about? I'll have to look at the videos when I'm at my place.
TerryP said:Tider 27 said:TerryP said:rgene said:Terry - that link goes to a parent directory. Is that what you intended?
Hell, I spent almost a good half hour going through some of those links just watching different football scenes.
Any, mine is right, it's a chance to look at the '06 squad, their '07 squad, and see the differences in approaches.
So what do you think Terry? I noticed a good bit of the spread and the I-formation. He have any other formations that we should know about? I'll have to look at the videos when I'm at my place.
He fits what we've been doing with a few wrinkles thrown in...
Biggest thing that struck me was watching the QB play from '06 to '07 and the improvement.
kudzu said:The TE's need to get used more and I expect them to now. I don't know for sure but ,someone correct me, we didn't have one that could block and catch.
Now I'm not positive on that but that would seem to be the reason we didn't utilize that postion more last year.It's something we have been missing for quite a while.
kudzu said:Didn't realize we threw that much to him. That's a good thing.
Good point about the oline,forgot about the lack there of. Can't imagine how I could of though. :lol:
kudzu said:Delta, that's a good question. I'll leave that to the guys with a bit more x and o knowledge than I.
Like you I'm tired of our Oline getting man handled by what seems every team we play,regadless of who it is.
Terry, that watch is pretty slick, water resistant too!
BamaDelta said:OK, we've talked about the OL now for the past what 10 years? :shock: :wink:
Is it too big of a leap to say we were doing better and headed in the right direction before textbook-gate? We couldn't make a yard or 2 at least a couple of times vs. ULM, so we knew at that point we had huge problems (if we didn't know it before).
This might be a tough question to ask and really may end up being more than one question. How much of this type offense will depend on the OL strength (or weaknesses as the case may be)? I know having Antoine back will play a huge role in the development of the O line. Are we to expect that the O line will once again be our Achilles heel or will the new blood from the past few recruiting classes help with that situation?
I assume when Saban said that no one wants to change direction and this is Alabama's offense that we won't see a shift in the overall system. I also assume this would be a good thing for the O line. I guess my Magic 8 Ball question is when will the O line actually advance our progress rather than impede it??????