Everyone. But if everyone canāt, then no one should because I believe in equality before the law. Exemptions = inequality. I used to swim in anarchist waters, but Iāve since come to the position that polities can be justified under particular conditions (eg scarce natural resources, constrained geography, technology, etc.). In this case Iād obviously prefer taxation in the form of a sales tax rather than any tax on property or income. But in any case, equality is not only good for the citizen, but it also keeps the State in check by encouraging solidarity among the people. Exemptions is a kind of divide-and-conquer tactic employed domestically.
Iāve already explained why in my recent posts. Accepting gifts from the mafia gives them power over you. Likewise accepting exemptions from the State that doesnāt apply equally to everyone else corrupts the Church and makes church members supplicants to the State rather than to god. I may be an atheist, but I do see lots of potential for good in churches if they would actually serve their professed Master in deed rather than in creed. Subsidies, tax exemptions, and other privileges have always been a ploy by rulers to neuter and domesticate revolutionary leaders and their movements. Itās a bribe intended to dissuade ideologues and their followers from challenging government authority and the social order.