The @SEC revised tiebreakers:
-Must have played within 1 game of average number of conference games played by all teams.
-First tiebreaker is head-to-head.
-There are allowances for teams that lose a game dropping them below the eligibility threshold.
The one time allowance for a team is the ability to add one game one single time. Teams may add a game IF they are āreadyā to play and their opponent can not play.
Should extraordinary circumstances prevent a team from playing in the SEC Championship, there is a review process.
That process is @GregSankey reviewing the facts and establishing a process that could include formation of a determining body that could determine if relief is granted to the team that doesnāt have the required number of games.
Big takeaway from all of this is that the @SEC has to try to find a way to play Alabama-LSU and has to do it in the near term as LSU is already scheduled to play Florida on 12/12 and there is a possibility Florida needs that game for eligibility.
-Must have played within 1 game of average number of conference games played by all teams.
-First tiebreaker is head-to-head.
-There are allowances for teams that lose a game dropping them below the eligibility threshold.
The one time allowance for a team is the ability to add one game one single time. Teams may add a game IF they are āreadyā to play and their opponent can not play.
Should extraordinary circumstances prevent a team from playing in the SEC Championship, there is a review process.
That process is @GregSankey reviewing the facts and establishing a process that could include formation of a determining body that could determine if relief is granted to the team that doesnāt have the required number of games.
Big takeaway from all of this is that the @SEC has to try to find a way to play Alabama-LSU and has to do it in the near term as LSU is already scheduled to play Florida on 12/12 and there is a possibility Florida needs that game for eligibility.
