šŸ“” The revamped transfer waiver guidelines have turned into compromise of sorts after NCAA passed on allowing all transfers to be immediately eligible.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Google News!
  • Start date Start date
G

Google News!



Last year, a high-profile overhaul of NCAA transfer rules stopped short of creating free agency in college sports.

A much quieter change, however, helped quarterback Shea Patterson play for Michigan and will determine whether Justin Fields is eligible this fall at Ohio State. The modification to the waiver process can be seen as something of a compromise that has cleared the way for more athletes to switch schools and play right away.

ā€œThe membership wanted to put immediate eligibility back on the table,ā€ said Dave Schnase, the NCAA vice president of academic and membership affairs. ā€œAnd so whether that resulted in a high approval rate, I don’t think membership knew. They just wanted to put that back on the table. And then the circumstances of each individual case would essentially dictate the approval rate.ā€
Immediate eligibility for all transfers was considered, but ultimately not included in the NCAA’s well-publicized reformation last year. New rules no longer require athletes to request permission from a school to transfer, just provide notification. Then the athlete’s name is entered into an NCAA-run database, the so-called transfer portal that notifies other schools the athlete can be recruited.

The new legislation, however, did not change the waiver guidelines. That modification was approved by the NCAA Division I Council in April , with few outside the process noticing.

Before the change, immediate eligibility for an undergraduate transfer could be granted only when a school could show extremely egregious behavior by the previous school. Otherwise, the most NCAA officials could grant was an additional year of eligibility, tacked on at the end of a college career.

A request for immediate eligibility can now be granted if the transfer was due to ā€œdocumented mitigating circumstances that are outside the student-athlete’s control and directly impact the health, safety and well-being of the student-athlete.ā€

There is a lot of wiggle room in there for discussion.

Patterson’s was the first well-known case to go through under the new guidelines. He transferred to Michigan after Mississippi was hit by NCAA sanctions.

Patterson was granted eligibility for the 2018 season in late April , and several of his former Ole Miss teammates later had their waivers approved. Other cases drew attention, too, including receiver Demetris Robertson being allowed to play immediately after transferring from California to Georgia. Running back Antonio Williams was granted immediate eligibility after transferring from Ohio State to North Carolina.

Attorney Tom Mars worked with Michigan on Patterson’s waiver and now is helping Fields, the former five-star recruit who has transferred from Georgia to Ohio State. Mars said the waiver change so far seems to have been a positive step by the NCAA.

ā€œBy enacting a new rule that allows such allegations to be described as mitigating circumstances instead of egregious behavior, the NCAA has encouraged member institutions to settle these matters without the student-athlete’s previous school having to admit to any wrongdoing,ā€ Mars said. ā€œOver time, this more collaborative approach to addressing waiver requests is likely to result in more positive outcomes for student-athletes. What’s more, the new rule’s endorsement of cooperation between the two schools will undoubtedly result in speedier decisions by the NCAA staff.ā€

Citing student privacy laws, the NCAA and schools do not publicly explain waiver decisions.

The rate of transfer waiver approval from April 1-Nov. 9 was 66 percent across all sports, down from the 2017-18 school year when it was 83 percent. But waivers requested before April 1, 2018, include those requesting an extra year of eligibility, not just immediate eligibility.

Since last year’s change, NCAA data for Division I shows:
— 63 football players requested waivers and 50 were approved (79 percent).
— 55 men’s basketball players requested waivers and 33 were approved (60 percent).
— 39 women’s basketball players requested waivers and 30 were approved (77 percent).

Schnase said more requests for immediate eligibility are being granted, but because each request is different numbers alone won’t determine whether the change has been successful.

ā€œWe feel like the pendulum has swung back to the right place,ā€ Schnase said. ā€œBut how we answer that and how anybody answers that depends on the seat that he or she is sitting in. Coaches might feel one way. Presidents and ADs (athletic directors) might feel another. And student-athletes might feel a different way.ā€
 
In case you've missed this story...

There's another pretty high profile story that'll likely be headline news in the next few days. Bru McCoy, a recent commitment and early enrollee at USC, is already in the transfer portal according to reports. He was at USC, and in school, for about a month. He never set foot on their practice fields.

But, there's always a bright side:




Back to Bru's story...he'd committed to USC and it's largely believed that was due to their hiring of Kliff Kingsbury. But, with KK headed to the NFL, McCoy has had a change of heart. It's believed his intent is to try to transfer to Texas.

One thing is for certain...these struggles we're seeing at USC under Helton aren't anywhere close to being over. A losing season last year, their worst recruiting class since classes have been ranked, and now this last class is falling apart.
 
Ultimately folks will say it's the right move, but I think the NCAA got out in front of the Fields and McCoy issue to look good and appear proactive. I think they see the wroting on the wall as far as power is concerned. They know they have lost almost all respect and a lot of power in the last ten years or so. Instead of folding as a whole, step back, grant freedom, and still collect revenue.
 
The Have Nots is the reason you have this early NSD since they were tired of the Big Boyz taking their better recruits away near the old NSD due to the Big Boyz having to drop down to their B-list. It was getting pretty bad even with the old NSD program with the fallout when a HC or assistant moved on to another gig. If you ask to play in shite then expect to get some on you.

Re-instate the old NSD.

Oh and return the kickoff to the 40 and a touchback on the kickoff gets you started at the 20!
 
The Have Nots is the reason you have this early NSD since they were tired of the Big Boyz taking their better recruits away near the old NSD due to the Big Boyz having to drop down to their B-list. It was getting pretty bad even with the old NSD program with the fallout when a HC or assistant moved on to another gig. If you ask to play in shite then expect to get some on you.

Re-instate the old NSD.


Right now, under the old format, we would be sweating it out for Trey Sanders, Antonio Alfano, Evan Neal and the other 21 recruits that has us at #1 in the country. Instead of being able to put all your effort in the last 5 or 6 players during cherry picking season for the last month and a half, all the coaches would still be wooing and visiting the 24 signed and delivered, plus going after the prima donnas. The NCAA has allowed the recruiting process to begin earlier for players to start officially visiting and there's no doubt that both coach and player have had plenty of time to do their due diligence in making these decisions.

Alabama continues to lose a ton of coaches every year. How would you feel trying to close the entire recruiting class with another brand new staff?
 
Back
Top Bottom