šŸˆ The power conference college football teams outrecruited the most by non-power programs

PhillyGirl

Member
The power conference college football teams outrecruited the most by non-power programs

This February, Houston landed its first ever five-star prospect en route to a composite class ranking better than 26 Power 5 teams. The Cougars weren't the only outsider to crash the party on National Signing Day. Nineteen different mid-major universities outrecruited at least one Power 5 program when the dust settled on 2016.

This winter wasn't an outlier. It was the continuation of a trend that has kept some power schools anchored to the bottom of their conferences and made outsider programs like Cincinnati and Boise State constant postseason presences. So which Power 5 teams get outrecruited by the FBS's little brothers the most? And which non-major programs are the most impressive when it comes to snapping up high-level prospects? Let's take a look at 247Sports' composite rankings from 2010 on to get a better idea.

Screen_Shot_2016-02-23_at_5.06.43_PM.0.png


Thirty-seven of the country's 64 Power 5 teams were outrecruited by a non-major in the seven seasons between 2010 and 2016. Four teams in particular made it an art form. No team lost recruiting battles to non-Power 5 teams quite like Kansas, who lost to an average of seven outsiders per year.

Boston College, a team beaten in the recruiting rankings 48 times by overachieving mid-majors, has also established itself as a rare breed in poor recruiting. The Eagles have finished in the bottom three among Power 5 conference teams in three of the past six years.

This lack of elite recruits has had an impact on the gridiron. The "top" five teams have combined for only 11 bowl appearances (six of which came from Bill Snyder's Kansas State) in the past seven seasons.

Screen_Shot_2016-02-23_at_5.24.39_PM.0.png


Recent upswings at Houston and South Florida have helped make the AAC the class of college football recruiting outside the Power 5. Tom Herman's latest Cougar class outranked 26 other major conference programs. USF, on the other hand, has beaten at least two Power 5 teams on the recruiting trail each year since the turn of the decade.

While there is certainly a group of usual suspects who can be relied upon to have a strong recruiting trail presence, 32 different programs can boast beating a Power 5 team between 2010 and 2016. Granted, that's usually Kansas or Boston College, but it's still an achievement that can lead to sustained success down the line. Utah State, for example, has topped only two major conference teams in the recruiting rankings since 2010, but the Aggies are riding a five-season bowl streak.
 
A factor of some of those numbers are schools that are allowed to take partial qualifiers.

We've sort of broached this subject a few times over the last few years. You've got a great point about the partial qualifiers, though that really only fits certain conferences. A few years ago SEC teams were allowed to accept PQ's, but there was a limit set by the conference.

Back in 2012 the NCAA pretty much eliminated the term partial qualifier, but the idea/concept still remains. Starting this year we're in the "academic redshirt" era a collegiate sports. How much it helps? TBD.

It's a pretty interesting read, IMO. How well it will be handled on the high school guidance/counselor side of things is the big question. It should force these people to start looking at eligibility in their freshman and sophomore years instead of the last semester of their senior season.

John Infante has done a pretty good job covering these changes. It's worth the google search...
 
We've sort of broached this subject a few times over the last few years. You've got a great point about the partial qualifiers, though that really only fits certain conferences. A few years ago SEC teams were allowed to accept PQ's, but there was a limit set by the conference.

Back in 2012 the NCAA pretty much eliminated the term partial qualifier, but the idea/concept still remains. Starting this year we're in the "academic redshirt" era a collegiate sports. How much it helps? TBD.

It's a pretty interesting read, IMO. How well it will be handled on the high school guidance/counselor side of things is the big question. It should force these people to start looking at eligibility in their freshman and sophomore years instead of the last semester of their senior season.

John Infante has done a pretty good job covering these changes. It's worth the google search...

Supposedly, that is their job. They are supposed to be keeping these kids on track to graduate HS and make the transition to college. Some counselors though, put it off on the parent. Athletic Directors do more for keeping these kids eligible in HS than counselors. Our HC/AD has set up tutoring sessions with kids that are struggling in an attempt to help them.
 
John Infante has done a pretty good job covering these changes. It's worth the google search...

I'll try to check that out. Thanks. Specifically, I think my comment was a knee jerk reaction to seeing USF at #1 when I can remember a few years back, losing Mike Ford to USF because he couldn't get in at Alabama (was that Saban's first class?). He went on to play THAT season at USF.
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
0
Views
1K
SEC Sports
S
S
Replies
0
Views
2K
SEC Sports
S
Replies
0
Views
287
S
Replies
25
Views
3K
Back
Top Bottom