šŸˆ ā€œThe market value for my position is about $300K, but I believe I’m worth $1M a year, easily.ā€ Top recruits share their NIL expectations ...




The NIL dollars flowing to roster retention and the transfer portal have ballooned over the years. The money in high school recruiting has also grown.
ā€œThe market value for my position is about $300,000. But I believe I’m worth $1 million a year, easily.ā€

That sentiment, shared by a 2027 recruit at a non-premium position, encapsulates the current state of NIL in high school recruiting: a volatile mix of expectations, secrecy and a disconnect between market value and what the players demand.

To peel back the curtain, we surveyed dozens of Rivals300 prospects from the 2027 and 2028 classes. To ensure total candor, we granted them anonymity. What they revealed is an ecosystem where the ā€œbaselineā€ has shifted, and the gap between the haves and the have-nots is no longer just about wins and losses – it’s about the bottom line.

The seven-figure standard​

When we asked prospects about their largest offers, it became clear that the benchmark for elite talent at premium positions starts at seven figures. The high-water mark? A reported $2.5 million per year offer with a total commitment of $7.5 million over three seasons.

While that is the ceiling, the floor has risen as well. Only one recruit reported they would consider a program for less than $350,000. For the elite, the price of admission starts at $750,000, with several stating they wouldn’t even end their recruitment for anything less than a cool million.

Programs developing reputations in world of NIL​

The big NIL spenders, according to high school prospects, are becoming clearly defined. The usual suspects like USC, Oregon, Texas A&M and LSU dominate the high-end offers, new programs are trying to enter the arms race.

UCLA, Cal and North Carolina were frequently cited as ā€œmost openā€ regarding NIL discussions with recruits. For UCLA and Cal, NIL is a tool to ignite fanbases under first-year coaches; for UNC, it’s about providing Bill Belichick the resources to improve the program’s fortunes in year two. Their pitch is simple: ā€œThis is your minimum offer, this is what it could grow to, and if you perform, we’ll reset the table.ā€

Conversely, Georgia was the program most frequently cited for offering substantially less than some of its peers. Kirby Smartā€˜s program sells NFL development as a long-term financial play that outweighs an upfront NIL check.

Stanford leans on the ā€œ40-year decision,ā€ promoting its degree as a more lucrative value than any up-front NIL deal. Meanwhile, programs like Minnesota and Kansas State sell stability and local branding over massive national collective bags.

Culture of secrecy still surrounds NIL​

Despite the massive sums involved, and the fact that paying college athletes has been legal for coming up on five years, prospects remain extremely reluctant to openly discuss NIL’s very real impact on their recruitments.

The paper trail remains non-existent, currently. Every 2027 recruit surveyed confirmed that their NIL offers are 100% verbal. While some Power Four commits expect to see figures in writing during official visits in the coming months, the industry currently runs on trust.

That trust doesn’t extend to their peers, though. While recruits are quick to gossip about which schools have the biggest bags, they are incredibly guarded about their own numbers.

ā€œMy agent said never share your worth with someone who could be competing for that same amount,ā€ one recruit noted.

There is a prevailing sense that everyone is exaggerating a little, leading to a hall-of-mirrors effect where every recruit feels they might be underpaid.

2027 recruits share NIL market values​

The disparity in worth remains tied to on-field impact. Elite edge rushers and quarterbacks can command seven figures, but interior offensive linemen and linebackers are finding a much tighter market. The prospects we interviewed shared these numbers when asked about the market rate at their position.

Quarterback: $500,000 – $3 million
Running Back: $300,000 – $675,000
Receiver: $350,000 – $1.3 million
Tight End: $250,000 – $350,000
Interior Offensive Lineman: $200,000 – $300,000
Offensive Tackle: $400,000 – $1.5 million
Defensive Tackle: $350,000 – $1 million
Edge Rusher: $500,000 – $2.5 million
Linebacker: $200,000 – $400,000
Cornerback: $325,000 – $800,000
Safety: $250,000 – $600,000

2028 recruits on hold for now​

If 2027 recruits are currently living in the NIL Wild West, the 2028 class is waiting for the gold rush. Rising juniors reported that programs are largely refusing to discuss firm numbers until film of their upcoming season is available. However, the professionalization of these athletes is already complete; all but three players surveyed already have formal representation.

Whether it’s a sports agency or a ā€œfamily-officeā€ approach led by lawyer-parents, the days of the hat on the table being a surprise are over. The recruitment of the modern athlete has moved out of the living room and into the office, and as one 2028 prospect put it: ā€œI have an idea of what I’m worth, but it could be more in a year.ā€
 
NIL was supposed to be for the use of name, image and likeness off the field. It's not. It's become the value of their skills on the field. Stop calling it NIL. It's pay-for-play.
I'm glad somebody else sees it that way.

They need to VASTLY update the rules to where players don't get paid unless their image, name, or likeness (NIL) is used in a promotional/advertisement aspect.

Now if they want to do endorsements for third-party companies (non-school-affiliated like Nike, Converse, Reebok, etc.), then by all means go get paid. But again, those would clearly be promotional/advertisement aspects as they'd be chosen to promote a brand or product. But getting paid millions just to sign with a school is nonsense and nothing different than what pro teams do.

I suspect soon enough we'll stop seeing stars next to their names and instead see dollar amounts. And that's just sad.
 
I'm glad somebody else sees it that way.

They need to VASTLY update the rules to where players don't get paid unless their image, name, or likeness (NIL) is used in a promotional/advertisement aspect.

Now if they want to do endorsements for third-party companies (non-school-affiliated like Nike, Converse, Reebok, etc.), then by all means go get paid. But again, those would clearly be promotional/advertisement aspects as they'd be chosen to promote a brand or product. But getting paid millions just to sign with a school is nonsense and nothing different than what pro teams do.

I suspect soon enough we'll stop seeing stars next to their names and instead see dollar amounts. And that's just sad.

It's even worse than the pros because there are no meaningful regulations at the collegiate level... contracts, salary caps, punishments for tampering, etc... About the only pure sports left at the collegiate level are some of the olympic sports... swimming and track and such. Football and basketball are nothing more than hired guns at this point. For me, it has taken most all the fun out of winning anything. It's infiltrated baseball and softball too... making those sports (in terms of results) less meaningful in my eyes. It all sucks and I wish the whole thing would somehow collapse.
 
It's even worse than the pros because there are no meaningful regulations at the collegiate level... contracts, salary caps, punishments for tampering, etc... About the only pure sports left at the collegiate level are some of the olympic sports... swimming and track and such. Football and basketball are nothing more than hired guns at this point. For me, it has taken most all the fun out of winning anything. It's infiltrated baseball and softball too... making those sports (in terms of results) less meaningful in my eyes. It all sucks and I wish the whole thing would somehow collapse.
Couldn't agree more. It's taken about all of the enjoyment out of it for me. I hate it happened at the same time Saban left because folks I know who aren't Bama fans think I'm a fair weather fan but losing and winning have nothing to do with it I'm just tired of the crap show it's become.
 
It's even worse than the pros because there are no meaningful regulations at the collegiate level... contracts, salary caps, punishments for tampering, etc... About the only pure sports left at the collegiate level are some of the olympic sports... swimming and track and such. Football and basketball are nothing more than hired guns at this point. For me, it has taken most all the fun out of winning anything. It's infiltrated baseball and softball too... making those sports (in terms of results) less meaningful in my eyes. It all sucks and I wish the whole thing would somehow collapse.
Another difference from the pros is the players pocket pretty much all the money (other than the agents). Theres no owner to get fat off this model, the money goes straight to the players.
 
Another difference from the pros is the players pocket pretty much all the money (other than the agents). Theres no owner to get fat off this model, the money goes straight to the players.
Which makes you wonder if it will bleed uphill into the NFL. Will players demand higher and higher pro salaries due to how much they made in college?
 
Back
Top Bottom