🌎 State of The Union Address

[TerryP]

What it means is Trump gets almost hard when talking about violence, like some kind of fetish

 

[TerryP]

What it means is Trump gets almost hard when talking about violence, like some kind of fetish

But...

 

[TerryP]

To a degree yes, but good news- dems are going to win the midterms if there isn’t any bullshit from the party in charge now

That would be typical.

If this happens, and we see the impeachment thing again? What happens with the White House in the next election?

 

[ElephantStomp]

That would be typical.

If this happens, and we see the impeachment thing again? What happens with the White House in the next election?

Dems will win the White House in 28.

 

[TerryP]

Dems will win the White House in 28.

Please. Don't be throwing this out before the mid-terms. It's wish-casting considering the "line-up" of the party.

If what I suggested ends up being true that would also mean that the party has chosen the same path: but now there isn't a "Trump" to hate. They'll be attempting to impeach a guy who has a higher approval rating in his party than ... I think I heard ever been recorded or all-time high, something like that.

Since we're going there briefly ... here's what I see a major problem for '28.

The Democratic Party has been attacking Trump. Now they are going to have to attack policy.

 

[It Takes Eleven]

Please. Don't be throwing this out before the mid-terms. It's wish-casting considering the "line-up" of the party.

If what I suggested ends up being true that would also mean that the party has chosen the same path: but now there isn't a "Trump" to hate. They'll be attempting to impeach a guy who has a higher approval rating in his party than ... I think I heard ever been recorded or all-time high, something like that.

Since we're going there briefly ... here's what I see a major problem for '28.

The Democratic Party has been attacking Trump. Now they are going to have to attack policy.

Whether Vance, Rubio, or someone else in the administration, they'll have to defend policy stances, as well as they way they were enacted.

 

[TerryP]

they'll have to defend policy stances

Versus what? What's the counter argument?

 

[It Takes Eleven]

Versus what? What's the counter argument?

Whether Vance, Rubio, or someone else in the administration, they'll have to defend policy stances, as well as they way they were enacted.

Not counter. And. Both.

 

[TerryP]

Not counter. And. Both.

If they are defending a policy that means the policy is being attacked as bad policy. If one attacks something and says its bad do they really care how it was implemented?

Let's use Iran as an example here. I've seen numerous pundits on different outlets criticize the way this administration is handling the conflict. A lot of these critiques are coming from members of former administrations who tried several things to deal with Iran. From sanctions to appeasements none of them have worked. I have a hard time accepting the judgments of people who are criticizing something they couldn't accomplish. IF they want to comment, give me a different alternative than the failed options attempted.

Circing back:

If they are going to criticize policy, what's the counter? All I see is momentum taking them back to what hasn't worked. What's the alternative? What's the counter?

Otherwise, in my opinion, they need to sit down and shut the ...