I saw someone make a remark about the teams Arch has faced referring to the number of players on that opposing teams roster. I can't recall the exact numbers but do remember the disparity was a lot like how many scholly's found on a FCS roster vs FBSāseveral "strings" of depth. There was no doubt there were some two-way players but there you found it at most positions; not just skill.I assume @TerryP was referring to Arch being a "big fish in a very small pond" classification. Some have even said that Arch would only be rated a 3* if not for the last name.
It's not a knock on Arch, but level of competition played deserves notice (especially with his playoff appearances/numbers.)
