ElephantStomp
Member
It attacked and killed and was aggressive according to her. I donāt believe one bit of her story. An aggressive pointer? Cricket would be the first Iāve ever heard of and Iāve hunted with hundreds of pointers in SD and ND. Some can be not fans of little kids, but Iāve never heard of a pointing breed being āaggressiveā.The word "the" before family doesn't represent ownership or possession. Grammar matters as does comprehension.
IF a dog attacks a person I have a distinct notion that you'd "hate that dog" as well. Geez, man. You are getting caught up in the headline hyperbole ilk again. "She let the dog out" when the book says "the dog escaped." Damn, dude.
IF a bird dogs starts killing other animals? Yeah, it's put down again.
What I see is a group trying to pull a Romney 2.0 again. It was just as stupid then as it is now.
It was a pointer. A breed that's bred to point.
It killed one chicken after another; happily according to the book.
A dog, that's bred to point, is attacking and killing.
That's not something you can just say, "training." It's literally going against what it's bred to do.
In a hypothetical world I wish it would have been a pit. Then we could see the same ilk going off about how dangerous she is for owning pit bull. But, I'd wager, not a damn thing would be said about the chickens or putting the dog down.
I realize sheās a righty and youāre a fan of righty people, but my god youāve got to think of this logically