kudzu said:
Don't get yourself worked up about it.
They may pursue Bush, take away the heiseman, but USC won't see much if anything. They'll claim they didn't know,the ncaa will stamp it. Aloss of a few games maybe. Nothing we can do about it either.
I call BS! Had it been us or even "BARN" we would be and I quote "the closest that the NCAA has come to imposing the "death penalty" against a football program was against the University of Alabama in 2002. The most severe violation involved boosters paying players (most notably Albert Means) to come to Alabama. Infractions committee chairman Thomas Yeager said that the committee seriously considered giving
Alabama the "death penalty." He called the violations "some of the worst, most serious that have ever occurred" in NCAA history and claimed that the Crimson Tide were "absolutely staring down the barrel of a gun." [1] It finally settled on five years' probation, a two-year bowl ban and the loss of 24 scholarships over three years.
"
SOURCE
Sry to be an A** about this, but if Means case was so bad (not that I'm defending the actions of a DA booster), but what is so different about Bush's case. Same thing sounds like to me they both acquired money and other things for playing ball!