TerryP
Staff
you really start looking at the success he had at Louisville in his four years coaching there.
I know, the first thing people point out is his over all record. To start, let's take that into account.
From 2003-2006 Petrino's record was:
9-4
11-1
9-3
12-1
41-9 looks good on anyone's record, no doubt. But, when you start looking deeper into the story the numbers at face value simply don't tell the story.
In his four years, when you look at the competition Louisville face you'll find that their combined records were sub .500. Not by much, but never-the-less a combined record of 298-308.
His first season was in 2003 where he lead the Cardinals to a 9-4 season. Out of those 13 teams, 8 of them had records of .500 or less. 5 of the teams had .500+ records with Louisville losing 4 of those games. Their win coming against a 7-6 Houston team.
In 2004 the team finished with an 11-1 record. Out of those 12 games, 8 teams had records of .500 or less. 4 wins against teams .500+ including a 9-3 Miami team, an 8-4 Memphis team, a 7-5 Cincy team and their biggest win versus an 11-1 Boise State team.
2005 follows the same tone as 2004 except they had a record of 9-4. Out of those 12 teams, 9 teams had records of .500 or less with the remaining 3 over .500. Their win was against a 7-5 Rutgers team and two losses to a 11-2 Va Tech and 11-1 West Virginia squad.
2006, his best season. Louisville finished that year at 12-1 with 3 of their opponents winning 10 games or more. The lost to a 11-2 Rutgers team with 2 wins against Wake Forest (11-3) and West Virginia (11-2)
4 of their opponents won less than half of their games and the remaining six featured 2 teams with 8-5 records, 1 team with a 6-6 record and 3 teams with 7-6 records.
So, why did I bother going through all of this? To point out the number of "quality wins" he led the team to during his Louisville tenure.
West Virginia and Wake in 2006 make 2.
Beating the Boise State team, 11-1, in 2004 makes 3.
3.
This is just one of the reason I look at Petrino and the game this weekend with little concern.
One could surmise that you could look at Petrino overall and have little concern considering "This isn't the Big East."
I know, the first thing people point out is his over all record. To start, let's take that into account.
From 2003-2006 Petrino's record was:
9-4
11-1
9-3
12-1
41-9 looks good on anyone's record, no doubt. But, when you start looking deeper into the story the numbers at face value simply don't tell the story.
In his four years, when you look at the competition Louisville face you'll find that their combined records were sub .500. Not by much, but never-the-less a combined record of 298-308.
His first season was in 2003 where he lead the Cardinals to a 9-4 season. Out of those 13 teams, 8 of them had records of .500 or less. 5 of the teams had .500+ records with Louisville losing 4 of those games. Their win coming against a 7-6 Houston team.
In 2004 the team finished with an 11-1 record. Out of those 12 games, 8 teams had records of .500 or less. 4 wins against teams .500+ including a 9-3 Miami team, an 8-4 Memphis team, a 7-5 Cincy team and their biggest win versus an 11-1 Boise State team.
2005 follows the same tone as 2004 except they had a record of 9-4. Out of those 12 teams, 9 teams had records of .500 or less with the remaining 3 over .500. Their win was against a 7-5 Rutgers team and two losses to a 11-2 Va Tech and 11-1 West Virginia squad.
2006, his best season. Louisville finished that year at 12-1 with 3 of their opponents winning 10 games or more. The lost to a 11-2 Rutgers team with 2 wins against Wake Forest (11-3) and West Virginia (11-2)
4 of their opponents won less than half of their games and the remaining six featured 2 teams with 8-5 records, 1 team with a 6-6 record and 3 teams with 7-6 records.
So, why did I bother going through all of this? To point out the number of "quality wins" he led the team to during his Louisville tenure.
West Virginia and Wake in 2006 make 2.
Beating the Boise State team, 11-1, in 2004 makes 3.
3.
This is just one of the reason I look at Petrino and the game this weekend with little concern.
One could surmise that you could look at Petrino overall and have little concern considering "This isn't the Big East."