šŸˆ OT: IF you're Louisville, do you give Petrino another chance? Mods on Louisville sites are suggesti

The term dumpster fire has been used a bit here lately. I can't think of a better example than UAB where McGee is leaving as HC to be Petrino's OC.

But is that really a demotion??

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Garrick McGee didn't address UAB players about leaving. He learned well from Petrino. <a href="http://t.co/00Z77Rx8ud">http://t.co/00Z77Rx8ud</a> (h/t <a href="https://twitter.com/DrewChamplin">@DrewChamplin</a>)</p>&mdash; Jon Solomon (@jonsol) <a href="https://twitter.com/jonsol/statuses/421427089191878656">January 9, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
There is no reason for that, I'm not a fan of spineless people. These coaches spend all this time talking about doing things the right way, being men and handling your business.

And then they do this...

Louisville going backwards for the win.
 
I commend you for having a forgiving spirit for a family member. Note, family member.

I fail to see how the analogy fits when we're talking about a business situation versus a family situation.

My view on Petrino has changed over the years. It was his time at Arkansas that sealed the deal with me. It was not the point he had an affair. (though that does weigh heavily.) My issue with Petrino and his time at Arkansas was the financial liability he put the school through. They, UArk, were a hair away from a lawsuit where dozens of applicants could have, and in my opinion should have, brought a suit against the school when he hired Dorrell instead of more qualified applicants.

The way Petrino has left jobs demonstrates what I can only term as a devious type of personality. When he had an affair that spoke to his moral character. When he put the University of Arkansas in a position where they could have faced numerous lawsuits? That speaks to his total disregard for the well being of others.

Let's assume you're a business owner and you're interviewing for an open position in your company. You find out, through the vetting process, that one of your prospects has basically willfully ignored his former company's policy, hired a mistress which goes against employment regulations, paid off said mistress, and lied to his former boss...are you suggesting you're going to just forgive, forget, and move forward?

(As to his affair, I've grown to learn if a man, or woman, does step out on their spouse they are just as likely to steal, lie, cheat, you name it. The affair itself would have been enough for me to fire him. However, in today's age, I realize my moral compass points differently than a lot.)


Solid points. The affair was bad enough. The fact that he gave preferential treatment to his mistress over other candidates is truly disturbing. I don't fault any organization for taking a stand and saying that they wouldn't hire the man on those grounds. Myself though, I just believed in his words of remorse and I feel like he's done his time. Obviously, I could be wrong. Time will tell.
 
Back
Top Bottom