šŸˆ Muschamp fires Chaplain: wanted an "inclusive" program that didn’t have Jesus as ā€œa distraction.ā€

Boom has come up with a solution for which there was not a problem.
Well put. Sums it up nicely. It's my suspicion, it's all about recruiting as well.

I'm still confused as to this statement, "Muschamp told Despres the reason he was dismissing him was that he wanted an "inclusive" program & that "Jesus was a distraction" to the team's effectiveness. ."

That makes no sense. None.
 
Psychojoe, How does one decide which Christianity to promote to the team? The one you mention is very evangelical, post-reformation Christianity. (There is even a disagreement in Evangelicalism called the "Lordship Controversy"by serious Bible loving Christians). I doubt the Eastern Orthodox or Roman Catholic Christians would fully support what you just defined as Christian nor the members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Ladder-day Saints who tell me they are Christians when they knock on my door. Nor the many different oneness Christians, many of whom take their Christianity very seriously. To promote a particular form of Christianity is to risk controversy because a team is made of many different belief systems. Jesus is controversial as demonstrated by the thirty-thousand+ different Christian denominations which now exist and that number continues to grow. It seems most reasonable to have a person who helps student athletes find the spiritual support they need by referring them to their particular spiritual tradition rather than appointing one chaplain for the whole team who holds views some players may disagree with.

We do not know what Muschamp's problem is with the chaplain. My guess it has something to do with the letter the Freedom From Religion Foundation sent the University of S. Carolina concerning a public university paying team chaplains and in particular the chaplain he let go. That is probably the distraction Muschamp is trying to avoid. I think that Muschamp has recently denied he said "Jesus was a distraction" according to the link in the first post above. I personally do not understand why a team needs a chaplain when most universities are surrounded by churches and organizations offering spiritual guidance to students.

Arian Foster is a former player at the University of Tennessee who felt he did not have the option to attend a Church service with the entire team. There was an interesting ESPN article about Arian Foster . Here is some of what the article said.

"The separation of church and football -- not to mention church and public education -- blurred at Tennessee, Foster says. Coaches, led by head coach Phil Fulmer, scheduled trips to Sunday church services as team-building exercises. Foster asked to be excused. He was denied. (The school confirmed that these team-building exercises to churches took place.) Word spread: Foster was arrogant, selfish, difficult to coach. "They just thought I was being a rebel and didn't want to participate in the team activities," Foster says.

"I was like, 'No, that's not it. Church doesn't do anything for me. I'm not a Christian.' I said, 'We can do other team-bonding activities and I'll gladly go, but this doesn't do anything for me.'

"So I went, probably five times. I don't want to bring race into it, but we never went to any predominantly black churches. We went to a lot of those upper-middle-class white churches, which I always found interesting because the majority of the team was black, so I thought the majority of the team would relate to a black church. I would rather go to a black church, honestly, because the music is better to me. If the majority of your team is black, why wouldn't they try to make them as comfortable as possible? But I guess when you're dealing with religion, color shouldn't matter." From Arian Foster: 'I don't believe in God'
 
I'm not going that far if I'm Dabo. He's developed the program at Clemson to the point he doesn't have to recruit by pointing out what others are doing, but what his program has—and continues to—accomplish.

That said, to be such a dichotomy between to the two in-state schools when it comes to this subject? In a Bible-belt state? I doubt Dabo will have to mention what Boom said—someone will in his stead.

True. I wonder how has Jesus been a distraction from football at USCe. I mean was the chaplain just walking up int he middle of huddles at practice and asking the kids, "Hi, do you have a moment to talk about our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ?"
 
Joe, I have to ask, distraction from what. As much as I love college football, if a choice has to be made, my faith comes first. And yes, Roman Catholics and the various 'orthodox' groups can indeed have a relationship with Jesus. And yes, there are people in all groupings of Christianity who only give lip service to the teachings of Jesus, with what they do on Sunday having no effect on how they live on Monday.

As far as my definition of Christianity, it goes back to the earliest days of the church. Believers were first called Christians in Antioch, according to the book of Acts. The Greek word used literally means 'little Christs', and it was originally used as a term of derision by non believers, but quickly adopted by the believers. There was no compulsion to be a believer back then, indeed there were risks to being identified as a Christian, so there was little advantage to being a pretender.

If there was a threatened lawsuit by the organization mentioned above, the only distraction would be to the USCe administration. I have no problem with their being a team chaplain, obviously. I believe, though I do not know, that most team chaplains serve gratis, and would have an issue if public funds were used to pay the chaplain. I also would have a big problem were participation required, as it apparently was in the instance you cited above regarding Foster and UT.
 
He didn't stop with the chaplain. This move makes perfect sense; after all, surely it had to be the equipment manager who was holding USCe back for so long...

Longtime South Carolina equipment manager fired by Will Muschamp

Longtime South Carolina equipment manager fired by Will Muschamp
1a38ebc79524b7f7608f1b6830f0a206
Jon Cooper | 2 HOURS AGO

http://www.facebook.com/sharer/shar...otball/will-muschamp-fires-equipment-manager/

SHARE ARTICLE
https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?ur...ipment+manager+fired+by+Will+Muschamp&via=SDS

TWEET ARTICLE
muschamp-presser-650x342.jpg



Will Muschamp is making another change to the South Carolina staff.

According to The State, Muschamp told the paper he fired longtime equipment manager Chris Matlock and his staff Friday.

Muschamp had his first ā€œSpurs Upā€ Tour stop at The Zone at Williams-Brice Stadium two days ago showing off the Gamecocks’ new matte black helmets.

Fast forward two days and Muschamp has fired Matlock, who has served in his role since 2000 when he started under Lou Holtz. He previously worked as Notre Dame’s athletic equipment manager for over eight years. Matlock also worked for the Indianapolis Colts for five years as the assistant equipment manager.

Matlock is the secretary of the SEC Equipment Managers Association, and for 20 years, he has been an active certified member of the Athletic Equipment Manager Association.

Matlock is the second long-serving staff member to get fired by Muschamp this month, as Muschamp let go the Gamecocks’ chaplain Adrian Despres earlier this month.
 
When Boom was hired at UF, Foley had his hand in the hiring process for several positions. If you recall, that's the main reason ol' Charlie ended up in Gainesville only to be replaced by Pease (again, Foley influence.)

I suspect, with ample reason based on a conversation with one of the UofSC beat writers at work, that Boom is trying to put his stamp on the program. In a sense you can compare it to some of the moves Perkins made when he took the job in Tuscaloosa—out with the old, in with the new, in a dramatic, sweeping fashion.

The biggest issue, in my opinion, still remains; Muschamp isn't a good head coach.

I was told last night that there are several boosters that are upset with the decision. Some have even threatened to pull their donations. Pulling donations due to replacing equipment managers?!?! Yeah, that realism.

I have to wonder ... were these boosters upset when Holtz brought Matlock and his staff in? Were they threatening to remove support due to the old staff under Brad Scott being let go?

*** Just as a passing thought ... is UofSC in better shape today than they were when they hired Spurrier? I'd think those fans who actually understand how football programs work would be glad a liar and a quitter is no longer in charge of the program in Columbia.
 
Back
Top Bottom