Although meaningless, and in the arena of 'At least', Bama played Michigan score wise, closer than all of the other teams. Could help in moving to a higher final ranking. FWIW.
I would not question you, sir, because you're pretty damn sharp, but just to make sure we're on the same page, I was referring to the NCAA tournament. SLU lost 95-72. Now, it is possible I'm missing something and if so, please correct me.
I would not question you, sir, because you're pretty damn sharp, but just to make sure we're on the same page, I was referring to the NCAA tournament. SLU lost 95-72. Now, it is possible I'm missing something and if so, please correct me.
No. You should question me; ALL the time. Now you have me questioning myself; a good thing.
There was something that stuck out to me about UM vs SLU and it was an odd number, one less than 10, and it was the only single digit ... I'll see if I can put it together.
I would not question you, sir, because you're pretty damn sharp, but just to make sure we're on the same page, I was referring to the NCAA tournament. SLU lost 95-72. Now, it is possible I'm missing something and if so, please correct me.
I've looked through my history that morning and it involves some 12 or so stat sites I looked at with UM and the tourney. I can't remember what it was: I just know it was there.
One of the "rabbit holes" had to do with shooting, scoring, and percentages. IE: UT gets smacked around by UM and it was the worst 3PT percentage they have had in the tourney: the only game under 40 percent. On the other hand, the team that gave them the fits so far (1st half lead as example) was Bama and UM had their best game from behind the arc: almost 50 percent.
I'm not thinking it revolves around this ... but the more I think, the more confused I am on what I was researching. I suspect it came from an obscure stat; kill ratios. Teams in the tourney that have seven or more consecutive runs where they've held their opponents scoreless on a possession, three times in a row, win 90 percent of their games. So, if you can stop a team three times in a row, and do it seven times in a game, you'll win 9 of 10. I'll have to look at play by play to see if I'm right here...
Between getting Texas and OU confused all week last week, getting something like this mixed up while watching games ... not surprising, AT ALL. I don't forget what I read. I DO forget where, often.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.