šŸˆ LSU vs. Bama Position Comparison

Well, in my comparison I at least went to the statistics and didn't go on I'm a fan my team is way better than yours because I can talk about my guys all day.

QB: AJ McCarron is currently a first year starter and the majority of his mistakes came in his first game (2 ints) though he does own that one against Tennesse. Statistically against ranked opponents he's been pretty much lights out. Completing 61% of his passes and averaging 168 yards per game in the three games they've played ranked opponents. He's only gotten 3tds, 1 per game though. Jarret Lee has averaged 162 yards per game poorer than McCarron, but does complete more passes standing at 64% completion percentage. He is also averaging a solid 1.6 touchdowns per game. Jordan Jefferson averages a small amount of yardage per game, but his best statistic is that he's averaging 1 td per the 2 ranked games he's participated in. I'd have to give the SLIGHT ADVANTAGE TO LSU.

HB: Spencer Ware is averaging 4.30 yards per carry against ranked opponents and putting up about 0.6 touchdowns a game. With an average per game rushing total of 101.5, it's easy to see he's a big part of LSU's offense. Though, Trent Richardson is no slouch himself. Averaging 139.3 yards per game and an improbable 8.04 yards per carry and putting up 1.3 touchdowns per game, he's shown why he's deserving of the Heisman. Delusional LSU fans aside, ADVANTAGE ALABAMA.

WR: Ruben Randle and Odell Beckham are two great receiving threats. They're consistent and they can go get the deep ball, they are also the main reason Jarret Lee has put the numbers up that he has. Marquis Maze and Darius hanks aren't bad either, but in a Bama offense that relies on the run, the passing game can often times be neglected. Has AJ McCarron and this receiving corps matured enough to take on an elite secondary? Probably, but Jarret Lee and his team seem to be much more tested in this category. ADVANTAGE LSU.

OL: Alabama's offensive line can dominate you, downright destroy you off the ball and put your face in the grass. But up against Tennessee last week, struggled to get defenders off the ball and looked whipped in the first half (Though this may be due to the 8-9 people in the box). LSU themselves had a similar problem against Tennessee, which eventually worked itself out when the horses started to wear down the younger Tennessee team. Though LSU's offensive line has allowed fewer sacks. Bama's offensive line is definitely out to prove themselves this week and has consistently done well in ranked match-ups. I'd go SLIGHT ADVANTAGE BAMA

DL: Alabama's defensive line is definitely salivating after last season where they just couldn't seem to get to Lee or Jefferson. However, LSU is just better on their front 4. Bama only plays the 3-4 though so you'd have to account for Upshaw as part of the down lineman in this situation and say he's had one hell of a year. I'll still give the SLIGHT ADVANTAGE TO LSU. Despite the previous statement

LB: I don't think anyone will argue that if Upshaw isn't included in the DL, he must be in the LBs and with 2 potential first round draft picks and 1 first rounder in the making in Nico Johnson or CJ Mosely for that matter. Tahj Jones and Kevin Minter are just too young for the LSU LBs to be considered in this situation. Until they mature..ADVANTAGE ALABAMA.

DB: Honey Badger, if you're reading this. Please oh please, jump on our first moves looking for the INT. I'm fairly certain they will game plan for this young mans talent at attacking the ball and use it against him. As far as matching-up goes. The teams are fairly even, but solely because of the Ball Hogging skills of Tyrann Mathieu, I'll give the ADVANTAGE TO LSU.

Special Teams: I'm not going to get into this that much, but I will say this. Our horrid kick-off coverage is only offset by are great kick-off returns. If LSU can get it in the endzone or out of the hands of Marquis Maze. They can definitely swing the special teams game in their advantage. If Alabama can play their assignments and kick better, they'll be able to be in that much of a better position to win. I'll say it's a TIE because both teams need people to step up this game, and neither has proved they're much better than the other.

Coaching: I know LSU fans will go LES MILES because he's AMAZING. I know hardcore Alabama fans will go for SABAN because he's OUTSTANDING. I'll just sit back and let you debate this one. Both coaches obviously bring differing styles but obviously winning styles to their programs. I'll go TIE on this one also.


Finale: I think the only true factor that will be measured is heart in this game. I can tell you this much, Alabama wants this game. They remember last year and they will come out with a vengeance and a chip on their shoulder prepared to dominate. LSU is in a position it hasn't been in for a few years, with young stars who haven't been in a game that is of this caliber before. They'll be in a hostile environment away from their fan base and faced with a team that can push them around as much as they pushed other people around. It will be an interesting surprise for the LSU team and the Alabama team will learn what it's made of, and if it's resolve can truly hold back the Tigers. I personally think it will be a tie football game going into the waning minutes of the 4th quarter. Alabama will kick a field goal and LSU will be stopped on it's drive. Either way you put it, this game should be one for the ages. I'll crack open a cold beer and sit back and enjoy the moment.
 
Just a random thought after reading through this thread...

I see "veteran offensive line" mentioned on a few occasions. IF someone would like, they can look up the thread I put up before the season started. It dealt with experience on both sides of the ball.

In this case, there isn't a team in the SEC that has more starts along the offensive line—combined starts from LT to RT—than Alabama. LSU, if I recall correctly, came in third.

I've wondered, on the RB discussion, if people from both sides have chosen to forget how LSU recruited Eddie Lacy. He was "all world" his junior year of high school in the eyes of those within the borders of Louisiana...but, now?
 
I've wondered, on the RB discussion, if people from both sides have chosen to forget how LSU recruited Eddie Lacy. He was "all world" his junior year of high school in the eyes of those within the borders of Louisiana...but, now?

LSU quit recruiting Eddie Lacy for a few reasons:
1. His grades were pathetic. He would not have gotten into LSU. I guess he got into Bama though.
2. We received commitments from Spencer Ware and Alfred Blue who we had higher on our boards
3. He had character issues
 
He signed a poster on your wall?
Har-har! No, I got him to sign it at the Spring game one year.

Finale: I think the only true factor that will be measured is heart in this game. I can tell you this much, Alabama wants this game. They remember last year and they will come out with a vengeance and a chip on their shoulder prepared to dominate. LSU is in a position it hasn't been in for a few years, with young stars who haven't been in a game that is of this caliber before. They'll be in a hostile environment away from their fan base and faced with a team that can push them around as much as they pushed other people around. It will be an interesting surprise for the LSU team and the Alabama team will learn what it's made of, and if it's resolve can truly hold back the Tigers. I personally think it will be a tie football game going into the waning minutes of the 4th quarter. Alabama will kick a field goal and LSU will be stopped on it's drive. Either way you put it, this game should be one for the ages. I'll crack open a cold beer and sit back and enjoy the moment.

BamaFan9201--probably the most objective summary of the matchup I've seen on fan boards of either team...I have to say I agree completely, and you summed it up well above (except for the outcome :halo:. I dont' remember where I read it with all the crap out there on the internet about this game, but one reporter researched all the big SEC games of the last decade or so--hid summary was that in these games the team that lost the previous year got their revenge the next year...not what i wanted to hear, but sounds like your point.
 
LSU quit recruiting Eddie Lacy for a few reasons:
1. His grades were pathetic. He would not have gotten into LSU. I guess he got into Bama though.
2. We received commitments from Spencer Ware and Alfred Blue who we had higher on our boards
3. He had character issues

Since when does LSU concern itself with character issues ? You guys have had your fair share of thugs and thugish behavior. Besides, neither Ware nor Blue could carry Lacys jock.
 
Yes, because I actually watch games and have seen both play, instead of just looking at stats.

He's kinda pointing out that Lacy hasn't had as many opportunities as Ware, and is still putting up nearly similar numbers. I'm sorry, but Ware just isn't the premier back that you think. To look at the fact that Trent Richardson is also on the same team, Alabama obviously has the advantage in this category. Arguing that because "you saw it" is almost akin to UFO witnesses. There's such thing as a logical explanation and an irrational thought process. You're taking the latter form to heart. Fan is short for Fanatic after all.
 
Yes, because I actually watch games and have seen both play, instead of just looking at stats.

So you've seen Lacy go through tacklers like kids playing red rover? And then breaking away with his speed? He obviously must have, with the numbers he's putting up. Compared against Ware, averging 2x the yards per attempt, and his short runs, he must like getting tackled and going down almost immediately
 
So you've seen Lacy go through tacklers like kids playing red rover? And then breaking away with his speed? He obviously must have, with the numbers he's putting up. Compared against Ware, averging 2x the yards per attempt, and his short runs, he must like getting tackled and going down almost immediately

I can't wait for you guys to actually see Ware in a game. I hope Mcelwain is dumb enough to take Trent out and put Lacy in. I know Lacy will get a few carries, and LSU is not scared of him at all.
 
I can't wait for you guys to actually see Ware in a game. I hope Mcelwain is dumb enough to take Trent out and put Lacy in. I know Lacy will get a few carries, and LSU is not scared of him at all.

I've seen Ware play. Not impressed. You know what I can't wait for? Those purple and gold shades of yours getting smacked off when Ware barely manages 30 yards on the day.
 
Last edited:
I can't wait for you guys to actually see Ware in a game. I hope Mcelwain is dumb enough to take Trent out and put Lacy in. I know Lacy will get a few carries, and LSU is not scared of him at all.

Most of us here on this board love and follow college football.......we are also open minded,realistic, and have no objection at all with fans from other programs participating....but you have no credibility here and frankly, you give a bad name to some good LSU folk.
 
I can't wait for you guys to actually see Ware in a game. I hope Mcelwain is dumb enough to take Trent out and put Lacy in. I know Lacy will get a few carries, and LSU is not scared of him at all.

I've seen Ware play SEVERAL times this year... good back. Lacy WILL get touches, he does every game and I hope ur defense feels the same way about Lacy that you do (I highly doubt it) because the first time he lowers his shoulder on one of them they won't feel that way... and then the next play when he puts an XBox 360 spin move on em they really wont think that way...

Dude you can't sit there and try and say some of us havent seen ur guys play and then make an unbelievably ignorant comment like that about Lacy. Because you have NOT seen him run if that's how you feel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any argument that starts with slight advantage Alabama in the RB comparison is idiotic at best. In no way shape or form does LSU's RBs compare to Alabama's.

I will give LSU credit they have a good team, but please tell me what makes anybody think Alabama doesnt win by double digits?
 
LSU plays 4 man front on defense Bama plays 3 man front. So our 3 men have held oppnents to lower rushing stats than the 4 men LSU put out there. odd how that is adavantage LSU. #7 isn't effective unless he is stripping the ball from a ball carrier. trying to rip it from trent he could damage tendons and maybe pull back a nub at the wrist. #7 can't cover and can't tackle. without the interceptions and fumbles he is nothing.

D lineman don't hold teams to low rushing stats only, the linebackers are the ones that are the end game in a rushing play, the LBs are where rushing stats are either held down or explode. (We still have the advantage as you said one or the other) and #7 can't cover or tackle... hard to make an interception or force a fumble when you can't cover or tackle, huh? I just disagree with what you're saying, sorry
 
How dumb is a position comparison anyways... any body seen Stanford play at all? I wonder how their "position comparisons" look against teams they play? To provide an answer: I would imagine everywhere but QB it's pretty unbalanced and they still shove teams in the ground-- it's important to have good players at every position but by no means does one team having advantages over the other team mean much of anything
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
787
    • Like
Replies
18
Views
645
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
S
Replies
0
Views
576
SEC Sports
S
    • Like
2
Replies
34
Views
830
Back
Top Bottom