2017- Five night games, none against a ranked opponent.
2016- Six night games, two against ranked opponents where they went 1-1.
2015- Seven night games, one ranked opponent (W) and a loss to unranked Arkansas.
2014 - Seven night games, two against ranked opponents where they went 1-1
2013- Four night games, none against ranked opponents.
I could continue on this list but we'll stop at five years. I believe you can see the trend I'm pointing to here already.
29 games, 5 of those against ranked opponents, and they're 3-2.
86-11 (.886) is a hell of a number at night. Over the last five years 17% of their night games were against ranked opponents, and they're 3-2. More clearly stated, one game over .500.
I'm not trying to take away a thing about a game at night in Baton Rouge. However, I do take exception to the mention of their record at night when so few games are played against ranked opponents. In a sense it's a lot like the Miami turnover chain and that narrative last season when they didn't lead the NCAA in turnovers but were tied with a few other teams.
It sounds good for hype, but how much of it is hype?
2016- Six night games, two against ranked opponents where they went 1-1.
2015- Seven night games, one ranked opponent (W) and a loss to unranked Arkansas.
2014 - Seven night games, two against ranked opponents where they went 1-1
2013- Four night games, none against ranked opponents.
I could continue on this list but we'll stop at five years. I believe you can see the trend I'm pointing to here already.
29 games, 5 of those against ranked opponents, and they're 3-2.
86-11 (.886) is a hell of a number at night. Over the last five years 17% of their night games were against ranked opponents, and they're 3-2. More clearly stated, one game over .500.
I'm not trying to take away a thing about a game at night in Baton Rouge. However, I do take exception to the mention of their record at night when so few games are played against ranked opponents. In a sense it's a lot like the Miami turnover chain and that narrative last season when they didn't lead the NCAA in turnovers but were tied with a few other teams.
It sounds good for hype, but how much of it is hype?