Tidestalker
Member
I've been really impressed with some of what appears to be a difference in approach with the strength & conditioning over the last 2 years.
It sounds like the Clemson beat down was the end of the Cochran era, and brought the new regime in 2 years ago.
Is it fair to question whether or not there needs to be some adjustments made following this season's rash of injuries? Particularly the speedy/quick skill guys at WR (both stud WR's going down with non-contact ACL's), and of course the depleted RB position. Then there were CB & OLB's in drought throughout the year as well.
Personally I think it's more about bad luck - But if we were to continue seeing the same issues into next year, especially with skill guys - Would that change the approach? Gains are great, but we all know what the best ability is..... RTR
It sounds like the Clemson beat down was the end of the Cochran era, and brought the new regime in 2 years ago.
Is it fair to question whether or not there needs to be some adjustments made following this season's rash of injuries? Particularly the speedy/quick skill guys at WR (both stud WR's going down with non-contact ACL's), and of course the depleted RB position. Then there were CB & OLB's in drought throughout the year as well.
Personally I think it's more about bad luck - But if we were to continue seeing the same issues into next year, especially with skill guys - Would that change the approach? Gains are great, but we all know what the best ability is..... RTR