There remains a misperception regarding Nick Sabanās motives for leaving Michigan State following a rare 10-win regular season in 1999. He was branded as selfish and greedy. Newspaper headlines replaced the S in his name with a dollar sign $.
Sabanās departure for the SEC riches was originally interpreted as a concession that the Spartans couldnāt consistently compete with their nosy neighbors in Ann Arbor, South Bend and Columbus. There were simply too many inherent disadvantages.
But in actuality, Sabanās exit crystalized the toxic disharmony within the greater university community as it pertained to the role of sports as a revenue-producing, image-projecting asset. It was never that Saban thought the Spartans couldnāt rule the Big Ten, but rather they couldnāt build a championship foundation without all of the critical factions ā the Board of Trustees, university president, athletic director and the big money boosters ā working in concert with a common objective.
There were factions within the family. Saban and then-athletic director Merritt Norvell never spoke. Influential boosters became the de facto heads of the athletic department, occasionally articulating strategy.
Remember Michigan Stateās aggressive pursuit of Marvin Lewis for the football head coaching opening in 2002? It ultimately failed because there were those within the university administration who didnāt think athletic coaches should make salaries worthy of a Fortune 500 corporate CEO.
Sharp: In hindsight, Saban's exit helped MSU
Sabanās departure for the SEC riches was originally interpreted as a concession that the Spartans couldnāt consistently compete with their nosy neighbors in Ann Arbor, South Bend and Columbus. There were simply too many inherent disadvantages.
But in actuality, Sabanās exit crystalized the toxic disharmony within the greater university community as it pertained to the role of sports as a revenue-producing, image-projecting asset. It was never that Saban thought the Spartans couldnāt rule the Big Ten, but rather they couldnāt build a championship foundation without all of the critical factions ā the Board of Trustees, university president, athletic director and the big money boosters ā working in concert with a common objective.
There were factions within the family. Saban and then-athletic director Merritt Norvell never spoke. Influential boosters became the de facto heads of the athletic department, occasionally articulating strategy.
Remember Michigan Stateās aggressive pursuit of Marvin Lewis for the football head coaching opening in 2002? It ultimately failed because there were those within the university administration who didnāt think athletic coaches should make salaries worthy of a Fortune 500 corporate CEO.
Sharp: In hindsight, Saban's exit helped MSU
