🏈 If you've watched any of Media Days, you've seen the FPI predictions for the SECC Champ.

[TerryP]

... and seen how it's projecting LSU to win the West.

The SEC champ for 2016 is projected with:

LSU with a 32% chance to win the conference.
Tennessee with a 29.8% chance to win the SEC.
Bama with a 12.4% chance.

Last season, there were a lot of games where the FPI was flat our wrong. Those projections for the SECC?



Of course, we all remember who was picked to win the SEC by the media.

Which leads me to this question. Evidence has shown the FPI projections don't mean a damn thing. Why do they continue to refer to them?

 

[TheChief]

My feelings exactly. The only thing I can think of would be their lack of any real substantial evidence for how this season will end, so they invent some.

Maybe I could start "The Chief's Projection". I've got Bama at 98.211% chance of winning the SEC. Hey Sankey, tell Finebaum to spread the word. This season's over and it hasn't even begun. By the way, the projection also has UT at 100% chance of remaining douche bags.

 

[TUSKtimes]

When I take the Bama FPI divide by 3 and log the data into my router/modem I get free wifi.

 

[OldPlayer]

By picking one team, it gives all the other teams hope and confidence.

 

[BAMAneck]

After looking at that makes me wonder : What do they know about Tennessee we don't , or Georgia .