šŸˆ I was expecting this kind of take on Bama's victory over LSU

By the same arguement regarding the officials, Georgia should have beaten the coon-asses. Which is it? Either way, the corn dogs are 4-2 in the SEC and not good enough to make it to the SEC Championship. Live by the sword, die by the sword. I'm sure the Ga fans are cryin' for ya, as we are.
 
I just wish GMac had connected with our two wide opened receivers so the irrelevant "no interception" call would have become even more meaningless (at least in Bama fans' eyes). I'm sure the LSU message boards would have created more excuses on why they didn't win besides the fact that they received an a-- whuppin.

I also wish there hadn't been so many dropped balls either.
 
I wish Alabama would have gotten half the pub this has when they have gotten screwed on call that were way more obvious than this questionable call.

Yes, and in spite of the feeding frenzy regarding this call and SEC refs, this call is not even close to being as bad as the celebration call against Ga in the LSU game and allowing the Fla TD on the interception return against MSU.

The replays certainly did not show that Peterson had posession and control of the ball at the time his left foot came down inbounds. As said above, they were inconclusive regarding whether the right foot came down in bounds. Hardly the conclusive video evidence to overturn the call on the field. This was a case where whatever was called on the filed was going to stand.

LOL at Dodd for quoting the LSU folks as saying it was an int. then saying Julio was not an unbiased source.

24 hours are well up. It is MSU time.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
760
Back
Top Bottom