Updated: Wednesday, March 4, 2009
After listening to the concerns of UA students at the Jan. 26 SGA town hall meeting, the student football ticket commission has submitted proposed policy changes to the Athletic Ticket Department to be considered for implementation in the 2009 football season.
Richard Byrd, head of the student football ticket commission and SGA chief of staff, said the purpose of the commission was to review all student ticket policies for away, home and postseason football games.
āIn reviewing the policies of the 2008 football season, the commissionās main goal is to work to allow the maximum amount of student access to home games by optimizing ticket usage,ā Byrd said.
This goal is made evident through several of the policy changes submitted for review including punishment for three unused tickets on a studentās account.
The commissionās submitted āRecommendations and Rationaleā to the Athletic Ticket Department reads, āOnce a student has three āresetsā [unused, non-donated, non-transferred tickets], they immediately become ineligible for postseason tickets for that year, and are also ineligible to purchase tickets for the following year.ā
Although UA President Witt had not seen the list of recommendations when he spoke to The Crimson White on Friday, he had a similar idea about what to do about students who do not use their tickets.
āI think without really having to reach very far, you could come up with a plausible set of explanations about why a student could not use his or her ticket for a given game,ā Witt said. āThat said, I think that the purchase of a ticket in a way is a privilege, and you owe it to your classmates, if youāre not going to use it, to get it back into the system.ā
In case of emergencies and to field complaints the commission also submitted a recommendation to set up an SGA board and an appeal process in August with the start of the football season.
āThe commission wanted to leave an option for circumstances we didnāt foresee to satisfy students. We know there are often circumstances beyond control and we wanted to be able to set up an appeals council for those cases,ā Byrd said.
When asked if he thought the proposal involving penalties would be met with much student opposition Byrd said, āI fully expect people to understand the commissionās reasoning.
Three tickets is a reasonable number, especially when the system is simple to use and transferring tickets takes less than minutes. I donāt expect any real opposition.ā
Another major issue discussed in the commissionās submitted proposal dealt with the purchasing of student tickets. The commission recommended the regular season purchasing process remain relatively the same with two conditions. The first condition addresses the problems dealing with the technical difficulties met by students in previous years when attempting to purchase tickets.
āWe are working with the ticket department to ensure the servers will be able to support the amount of students online at the same time. In past years, students have been prevented from buying tickets due to security settings on their personal computers or have been unable to log on because of servers crashing,ā Byrd said.
In order to combat this issue, the commissionās second condition for the student purchasing system is the creation of an information campaign through the partnering of SGA and the athletics and university administration.
āIn addition to making sure the RollTide.comās servers are capable of supporting the amount of students online to buy tickets, SGA will also work to head a large information campaign on everything students will need to know about tickets,ā Byrd said. āWeāre hoping to have a potential test website to ensure the servers will hold up. Weāre also planning on educating students on the details of the security settings on their personal computers in order to have everything ready to go by ticket sale day.ā
Along with the proposals dealing with unused tickets and ticket sales, the commission also reviewed policies concerning postseason tickets. The commission recommended students who attend regular season home games be given priority for SEC Championship and bowl game tickets over those who upgrade more than three tickets to paper tickets. Postseason tickets were also proposed to be sold according to the proportion of student in graduate and undergraduate studies, much like the allocation of Sugar Bowl tickets for the 2008 season.
āIn order to fairly distribute tickets to the whole student body, we believe postseason tickets should be available based on the proportion of students in graduate and undergraduate studies. We proposed 20 percent of the total population be sold to graduate students leaving the remaining 80 percent to undergraduate students,ā Byrd said.
Overall, Byrd said he thought the policy that would have the greatest impact on the students is the proposed policy regarding unused tickets.
āThere were too many unused tickets this last season and I believe this is the best policy we can put into place to help more students be able to attend home games. While having a penalty system set in place may not always be the best, sometimes it is the most effective and efficient.ā
After listening to the concerns of UA students at the Jan. 26 SGA town hall meeting, the student football ticket commission has submitted proposed policy changes to the Athletic Ticket Department to be considered for implementation in the 2009 football season.
Richard Byrd, head of the student football ticket commission and SGA chief of staff, said the purpose of the commission was to review all student ticket policies for away, home and postseason football games.
āIn reviewing the policies of the 2008 football season, the commissionās main goal is to work to allow the maximum amount of student access to home games by optimizing ticket usage,ā Byrd said.
This goal is made evident through several of the policy changes submitted for review including punishment for three unused tickets on a studentās account.
The commissionās submitted āRecommendations and Rationaleā to the Athletic Ticket Department reads, āOnce a student has three āresetsā [unused, non-donated, non-transferred tickets], they immediately become ineligible for postseason tickets for that year, and are also ineligible to purchase tickets for the following year.ā
Although UA President Witt had not seen the list of recommendations when he spoke to The Crimson White on Friday, he had a similar idea about what to do about students who do not use their tickets.
āI think without really having to reach very far, you could come up with a plausible set of explanations about why a student could not use his or her ticket for a given game,ā Witt said. āThat said, I think that the purchase of a ticket in a way is a privilege, and you owe it to your classmates, if youāre not going to use it, to get it back into the system.ā
In case of emergencies and to field complaints the commission also submitted a recommendation to set up an SGA board and an appeal process in August with the start of the football season.
āThe commission wanted to leave an option for circumstances we didnāt foresee to satisfy students. We know there are often circumstances beyond control and we wanted to be able to set up an appeals council for those cases,ā Byrd said.
When asked if he thought the proposal involving penalties would be met with much student opposition Byrd said, āI fully expect people to understand the commissionās reasoning.
Three tickets is a reasonable number, especially when the system is simple to use and transferring tickets takes less than minutes. I donāt expect any real opposition.ā
Another major issue discussed in the commissionās submitted proposal dealt with the purchasing of student tickets. The commission recommended the regular season purchasing process remain relatively the same with two conditions. The first condition addresses the problems dealing with the technical difficulties met by students in previous years when attempting to purchase tickets.
āWe are working with the ticket department to ensure the servers will be able to support the amount of students online at the same time. In past years, students have been prevented from buying tickets due to security settings on their personal computers or have been unable to log on because of servers crashing,ā Byrd said.
In order to combat this issue, the commissionās second condition for the student purchasing system is the creation of an information campaign through the partnering of SGA and the athletics and university administration.
āIn addition to making sure the RollTide.comās servers are capable of supporting the amount of students online to buy tickets, SGA will also work to head a large information campaign on everything students will need to know about tickets,ā Byrd said. āWeāre hoping to have a potential test website to ensure the servers will hold up. Weāre also planning on educating students on the details of the security settings on their personal computers in order to have everything ready to go by ticket sale day.ā
Along with the proposals dealing with unused tickets and ticket sales, the commission also reviewed policies concerning postseason tickets. The commission recommended students who attend regular season home games be given priority for SEC Championship and bowl game tickets over those who upgrade more than three tickets to paper tickets. Postseason tickets were also proposed to be sold according to the proportion of student in graduate and undergraduate studies, much like the allocation of Sugar Bowl tickets for the 2008 season.
āIn order to fairly distribute tickets to the whole student body, we believe postseason tickets should be available based on the proportion of students in graduate and undergraduate studies. We proposed 20 percent of the total population be sold to graduate students leaving the remaining 80 percent to undergraduate students,ā Byrd said.
Overall, Byrd said he thought the policy that would have the greatest impact on the students is the proposed policy regarding unused tickets.
āThere were too many unused tickets this last season and I believe this is the best policy we can put into place to help more students be able to attend home games. While having a penalty system set in place may not always be the best, sometimes it is the most effective and efficient.ā