General topic: Conference expansion, and how that impacts the SEC's efforts to expand.
Pitt and Syracuse ask to join the ACC. So is the ACC moving to expand or replace members that it anticipates losing?
At the same time ACC moves to increase the "buy-your-way-out" fees charged to teams who chose to move to other conferences in order to a better themselves. To me this sounds dirty on the ACC's part. Nearly doubling the fees seems clearly NOT about helping a school do what is best for its students, unless the conference is willing/able to replace that lost revenue. And if each school petitons the conferences for more money, how do you avoid the unfairness of a Texas/Big12 environment?
Is this the end of the Big East? Will the Big10 and ACC swallow up the value of the BigEast? What would this mean for the SEC, who seems geopgraphically limited to having a shot at West Virginia and TCU?
Pitt was one of the name floated as a potential pick up by the Big10. I have to think that this increases the odds that Boston College and Missouri end up in the Big10. Add Notre Dame and they only need one more. I'm guessing some Big East member, maybe Rutgers (NYC media).
If TCU comes free from the Big East, does the SEC have interest? Can we pull TCU from a state of Texas that desires to sustain the Big12? (Remember, if Missouri goes to the Big10, then the SEC will need one more out-west team to join TAMU to keep divisions the same in a 16 team framework.)
Texas A&M and (rumored) West Virginia seem to be the two bird-in-the-hand expansion options. Are there more? Who are they?
Pitt and Syracuse ask to join the ACC. So is the ACC moving to expand or replace members that it anticipates losing?
At the same time ACC moves to increase the "buy-your-way-out" fees charged to teams who chose to move to other conferences in order to a better themselves. To me this sounds dirty on the ACC's part. Nearly doubling the fees seems clearly NOT about helping a school do what is best for its students, unless the conference is willing/able to replace that lost revenue. And if each school petitons the conferences for more money, how do you avoid the unfairness of a Texas/Big12 environment?
Is this the end of the Big East? Will the Big10 and ACC swallow up the value of the BigEast? What would this mean for the SEC, who seems geopgraphically limited to having a shot at West Virginia and TCU?
Pitt was one of the name floated as a potential pick up by the Big10. I have to think that this increases the odds that Boston College and Missouri end up in the Big10. Add Notre Dame and they only need one more. I'm guessing some Big East member, maybe Rutgers (NYC media).
If TCU comes free from the Big East, does the SEC have interest? Can we pull TCU from a state of Texas that desires to sustain the Big12? (Remember, if Missouri goes to the Big10, then the SEC will need one more out-west team to join TAMU to keep divisions the same in a 16 team framework.)
Texas A&M and (rumored) West Virginia seem to be the two bird-in-the-hand expansion options. Are there more? Who are they?