šŸ“” ESPN headline: "Saban still opposed to expanding playoff field."

Max

Member
Clickbait leader, the article headline reads, "Nick Saban: Bowl games would 'disintegrate' by expanding playoff."



"I think the playoff ... continues to expand to minimize the importance of those games, maybe to the point where those games won't even exist," Saban said Thursday. "I'm not sure that is the best thing, overall, for college football.

The College Football Playoff is in the fifth year of a 12-year contract; under Saban, Alabama has made the playoff all five seasons, winning two national titles.

Saban argued that if the playoff were to expand, then more players would skip bowl games to prepare for their NFL futures and fewer fans would attend the games.

The importance of the non-playoff bowl games, Saban said, would continue to "sort of disintegrate."

"Which I'm not sure is good for college football," Saban said. "I'm not really for going eight teams in a playoff. It's a hypothetical question, that I have enough issues and problems to solve without thinking about something that may or may not happen."

On Thursday, Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick said he didn't see "any momentum for change" in terms of expanding the playoff to eight teams.

"I think it's working very well," Swarbrick said. "Having said that, I think every business should look at every aspect of its business. But being open to a conversation is not the same as being an advocate for particular change. I think we should talk about anything members think are relevant, but I don't see any momentum for change."
 
I guess it is how YOU look at the current setup. The BCS setup gave us the best two teams (so we thought) but left many thinking #3 or #4 were just as good as #1 or #2. Then you added a 3rd and 4th team just to make sure you got the 1st argument about 1 and 2 resolved. If your main task is to get the best 2 teams into the NC game then that is done and there is No Need to go any further.
 
Back
Top Bottom