🏈 debate

[musso]

who makes the better case? stephen or skip?

<object data="http://player.ooyala.com/static/cacheable/d35bca4690445c2131eb5b0c59553a7b/player_v2.swf" class="OoyalaVideoPlayer" id="ooyalaPlayer883446674_swgqf3t87v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="324" width="576">




</object>
<script src="http://player.espn.com/player.js?&playerBrandingId=4ef8000cbaf34c1687a7d9a26fe0e89e&pcode=1kNG061cgaoolOncv54OAO1ceO-I&width=576&height=324&externalId=espn:8274923&thruParam_espn-ui[autoPlay]=false&thruParam_espn-ui[playRelatedExternally]=true"></script>

 

[TerryP]

I wish Stephen A. Smith would stick with the NBA.

I suspect he was given the "defend Reggie" side of this argument as is in most cases. Setting that aside, he did what he could given what he had to work with.

If we follow what the NCAA has said down to the letter, those things Reggie did on the football field have been wiped from the book.

 

[musso]

my favorite is at the end when stephen says,

Why do you need somebody to buy you a suit? Why do you need someone to provide a home for you? Could it be because you didn’t have it?

i mean, really?