🏈 Dang I didn't know we had this many bowls games!

[rick4bama]

This isn't counting the playoff games either!!

 

[64Tide]

There were 13-15 in the 70's.

 

[rick4bama]

There were 13-15 in the 70's.

I counted 36 now. Not counting the playoff games.

 

[alabama mike]

Most of these games will be played with very few in the stands.

 

[rick4bama]

Most of these games will be played with very few in the stands.

You see some of those game this last weekend? I mean I think the SEC had the most at the game, now I didn't watch the B1G game?

 

[50+yeartidefan]

Most of these games will be played with very few in the stands.

Most more will have very few tuned in on the
Tv I know 1 who will not tuned in to many if any

According to time. What's going on. Opt outs.
Etc.

 

[rick4bama]

Now the one I posted here has JSU playing Cent. Mich.

 

[Secondand26]

There were 13-15 in the 70's.

And they were good matchups. I remember getting out of school for 2 weeks at Christmas & having a bowl game almost every night that was good.

 

[rick4bama]

I know why those top 3 declined they bowl games? But how can one that has a losing record declined?

 

[Secondand26]

View attachment 33311
I know why those top 3 declined they bowl games? But how can one that has a losing record declined?

Because they didn’t have enough teams with winning records

 

[rick4bama]

Because they didn’t have enough teams with winning records

As soon as I posted this, I thought about the 2020 years.

 

[sean]

Because they didn’t have enough teams with winning records

For that, there needs to be a rule. If there are more bowl games than teams with winning records, then that bowl game isn't played that year. And the list of bowl games not to be played needs to start with the newest one out first, then second newest, and so on and so forth.

Having a losing record shouldn't be rewarded with a bowl game.

 

[7276Bamabeancounter]

There were 13-15 in the 70's.

I am so old I remember when there were only nine bowls. You pretty much had to finish in the top twenty (the polls had not expanded to include 25 at that point) to get a bowl bid. It was truly a reward back then. Notre Dame had a policy back then to not go to bowls at all. They had to change that policy when the polls started waiting until after the bowls to make their final votes. I wonder how long they will hold out this time until they realize they are not special enough to not join a conference like all the other schools do.

 

[50+yeartidefan]

I think. There are enough fans for all the bowls.

 

[rick4bama]

What's troubling me is! The fact that coaches keep changing is proving to be a major problem for me. We know which team has them done. Is it not possible to delay this until the end of the season for all the teams?

By the way, Kiffin doesn't count! He is piece of crap anyway!!