šŸˆ Conference only games could cost Alabama $2.5 million...Georgia State wants their money

Well if "we" made the decision nit to play the game, then I honestly feel we should own up to our responsibilities and pay. What we get for scheduling shitty ass opponents and paying them, as well as the unfortunate side of that once in a lifetime situation that is killing everything.
 
Not surprised with this. Now it is based on the terms and conditions of the contracts and the lawyers negotiating around those terms. All contracts (should) have a termination clause and lawyers will go to work to sort things out.
 
Last edited:
Pay them then refise to ever schedule their like again. Sure they get a little now but lose a lot in the long run.

Or, if it is indeed the SEC's decision, and I'm sure it is and would be easy for UA to prove in court... Don't pay them and refuse to schedule them ever again. Also, let it be known to other SEC AD's that they'd be wise to steer clear as well.
 
Raise your hand if you read the article. šŸ™ƒ The article literally disputes itself.



The move to a 10-game, SEC-only schedule has left the University of Alabama obligated to pay out more than $3.5 million to schools that were originally contracted to play the Crimson Tide in Tuscaloosa in the 2020 season.

UA’s contracts with all three schools includes a clause that states, ā€œIn the event of … prohibitory or governmental authority, including that of the Southeastern Conference or the National Collegiate Athletic Association, making it impossible or impractical to play the game, both parties shall be relieved of any and all obligations of this agreement.ā€
 
Well if "we" made the decision nit to play the game, then I honestly feel we should own up to our responsibilities and pay. What we get for scheduling shitty ass opponents and paying them, as well as the unfortunate side of that once in a lifetime situation that is killing everything.

I think it would be a no brainer for us to pay the contract if ā€œweā€ were to be the ones that breached it. Problem is, we weren’t the ones to do that. It was the conference as a whole. I would imagine that the conference would be held liable and not the individual school. Also, I would guess that there would be some ā€œextenuatingā€ circumstances written into the contract to allow UA an out without penalty.
I know that the little guys program is sustained by these ā€œcontract winsā€, but damn! Shit happens!!
 

The Mountain West just pulled a genius move. "Allowing" 2 non league games has insulated them from both sides... Now, they can disregard any payments to FCS or lower league schools that would have received a pay day before they eventually cancel or postpone their own league, as well as request payments from P5 schools who have cancelled their non-league games. Smart work by that leagues leadership IMO
 
Back
Top Bottom