SoCalPatrick
Member
A thread by Kevin Sweeney using NorthWestern as an example on why he disagrees with public opinion.
As colleges take heat for athletes (vast majority asymptomatic) contracting COVID, public opinion seems to be that athletes are being put in needless danger just to protect the budgetās bottom lines.
Hereās a thread on why I disagree, using Northwestern as an example.
Northwestern took things slow bringing their athletes back ā official report day is 6/22. Theyāll get tested upon arrival. But while this is a return to team activities, itās certainly not a return to group workouts for most players.
Hereās something published recently on Northwesternās own social media channels: a star football player back in Evanston going to Chicago with a few teammates for field work and speed training.
On the hoops side, hereās sophomore forward Robbie Beranās highlight tape from some recent 5-on-5 runs. Go through social media, and youāll find this for several players at every school... and thatās only those who got it documented on video.
Of course, thereās nothing different about playing pickup or drills on or off campus ā COVID doesnāt have a bias towards higher education. The only difference is the players are being tested and then isolated when finding the positives before they spread it. This is a good thing!
Playing college sports this year is a big challenge, and right now I donāt think we can say it 100% can be done safely. But the media has to be really careful not to punish schools for testing athletes whoād be doing the same things whether on or off campus.
This tweet is a good one that ties back to my earlier point. Whether or not they are on campus, they are still going to be out and about if allowed (and even if not!). The difference is, they are actually getting tested because they are student-athletes.
As colleges take heat for athletes (vast majority asymptomatic) contracting COVID, public opinion seems to be that athletes are being put in needless danger just to protect the budgetās bottom lines.
Hereās a thread on why I disagree, using Northwestern as an example.
Northwestern took things slow bringing their athletes back ā official report day is 6/22. Theyāll get tested upon arrival. But while this is a return to team activities, itās certainly not a return to group workouts for most players.
Hereās something published recently on Northwesternās own social media channels: a star football player back in Evanston going to Chicago with a few teammates for field work and speed training.
On the hoops side, hereās sophomore forward Robbie Beranās highlight tape from some recent 5-on-5 runs. Go through social media, and youāll find this for several players at every school... and thatās only those who got it documented on video.
Of course, thereās nothing different about playing pickup or drills on or off campus ā COVID doesnāt have a bias towards higher education. The only difference is the players are being tested and then isolated when finding the positives before they spread it. This is a good thing!
Playing college sports this year is a big challenge, and right now I donāt think we can say it 100% can be done safely. But the media has to be really careful not to punish schools for testing athletes whoād be doing the same things whether on or off campus.
This tweet is a good one that ties back to my earlier point. Whether or not they are on campus, they are still going to be out and about if allowed (and even if not!). The difference is, they are actually getting tested because they are student-athletes.