
Are you referencing South Carolina playing good ball? Because it is quite the opposite. They had two tune-up games before conference play before losing to Clemson. Just a month ago, they lost a tough one to Virginia Tech.UofSC is playing pretty good ball. They won't remain a Q3. State and Mizzou should move up in two, three weeks.
View attachment 33676
Yes. I'll stand by that. I'm not expecting them to compete for the SEC, by any means. I do expect them to show up a few times and shock some people.Are you referencing South Carolina playing good ball?
Unfortunately, so have I. I don't see it that way (not that it matters.) As one example, they aren't doing as well as Bama and UArk with TO percentage...but they are top five SEC, I'm sure. They aren't any good on the boards: O or D. But, that's an area I believe they can improve.I've watched them some this season and it looks like a lot of the same issues
It's tough to gauge right now. I'm not completely on the Vandy bandwagon as of yet. Byington is a really good HC but Vandy's schedule has been very To me, Florida has looked the best despite not picking up any elite wins. Their games vs UConn and Arizona were absolute wars, and a display of tough basketball that just didn't bounce their way.@Bammerboy321 I'm trying to make sure I'm right here. I know I haven't seen A&M or Mizzou this season. I've only seen a bit of State. I've seen bits and pieces of several games with teams like OU, Texas, LSU. I'm pretty confident I've seen at least one entire game with the rest of the conference.
Right now, here's where I see the SEC in "TerryP's Power Rankings."
- Vandy
- Bama
- UT
- UF
- UArk
- UK
- UGA (they are going on runs this season as good as anyone.)
- LSU
- AU
- A&M (based on numbers and schedule results)
- TX
- Mizzou (see A&M)
- OU
- Ole Miss
- UofSC
- State
It's tough to gauge right now. I'm not completely on the Vandy bandwagon as of yet.
That should be "My projections would go like this."My rankings would go like this:
I think Vandy is definitely legit but I'm not ready to projecy them as rhe #1 team in the SEC just yet. Especially considering they have played a combined 5 Q4 opponents (Alabama has played 2).That should be "My projections would go like this."![]()
Vandy:
Look at FG percentage within the conference (based on OOC play.) FGD is 2nd best, FGO is #1. They are top five in TOO and TOD. ORB and DRB, top five.
Since we were talking about UofSC earlier and now Vandy. The 'Dores are on the road. After this game is over look at Vandy and defensive boards. My gut tells me that's the difference. UofSC isn't close to the top of the conference in FG percentages. There's not a lot of difference in the conference leader: five percentage points, maybe six.
Power Rankings. Not SEC projections. Present vs future.I think Vandy is definitely legit but I'm not ready to projecy them as rhe #1 team in the SEC just yet. Especially considering they have played a combined 5 Q4 opponents (Alabama has played 2).
I do trust Byington as a coach though.
More than likely not.Well we are about to find out about Vandy/Bama on Wednesday....
What am I missing? Why would we want to be at the bottom of the bracket or shy away from Florida? Maybe they are great but if you are going to take the next steps Bama has to up their game. I think Bediako will eventually turn out to be a difference maker. I certainly hope so.I want no part of Florida. I'd gladly sit at the bottom of this projected bracket.