Bowdon and Paterno was also part of some miserable teams, not dominant their entire careers. Saban has been pretty dominant everywhere he has been from what I have seen. Left Michigan State as they were turning the corner if we want o use that against him. Sure, a down year or so starting out, but raising the bar and maintaining it is more in my eyes. Bowdon and Paterno gimped around for how many years with truly no influence? Recruiting, sure, and maybe an instruction here or there, but no thumb on the program for years. Currently Saban has more wins for every loss over Bowdon and Paterno. He is still behind Bryant though by like 0.7 wins per loss.
Michigan State is part of the yardstick. And should be recognized as a living part of his HC resume. What's dominate about this?
1995-6-5-1
1996-6-6
1997-7-5
1998-6-6
1999-9-2
Off to LSU:
2000-8-4
2001-10-3
2002-8-5
2003-13-1
2004-9-3
Nobody can argue about 2003 being a great year, but is that the definition of dominate at LSU? Now Saban is over halfway into his HC career and he doesn't have one, back to back season of even 10 wins at LSU in an era they were playing 12 game schedules. Bowl record: 3-5. Is that a dominate HC resume, away from Alabama?
Last edited: