🏀 As Tennessee's women's program sits with no one on the roster; over 1/2 of '25's top 50 are in the portal

She comes across as someone as someone nobody wants to play for. I've seen her in huddles and she gives of the vibe that her players don't deserve her and the universe has slighted her somehow.
I'm reading vol Nation board and they're pretty much saying they blame it on AD and how the players has been coddled and Kim tried to break that bad habits. This time next year we'll find out who was right: Kim or the players who left.
 
I'm reading vol Nation board and they're pretty much saying they blame it on AD and how the players has been coddled and Kim tried to break that bad habits. This time next year we'll find out who was right: Kim or the players who left.
AD=boss. HC=employee. ...............
So emplyee doesnt perform.....Boss fies her.....regardless of fault

SameO.......going for.....HC......football
The natives....are....getting....restless...in...orange....town
 
Damn...with some hard cash...could build a "Kiffin " type roster...with some of that talent available
A thought, or two.

We've seen how broke UCLA's athletic department has been over the last five or so years. 70 something million was the last number I saw.

I'll assume UofSC spends some money on their team.

Yet, UCLA is your title holder.

I'd like to see a comparison of roster costs between those two.
 
A thought, or two.

We've seen how broke UCLA's athletic department has been over the last five or so years. 70 something million was the last number I saw.

I'll assume UofSC spends some money on their team.

Yet, UCLA is your title holder.

I'd like to see a comparison of roster costs between those two.
It does prove only that money isnt the only thing. I dont follow women bb. But has ucla even been a top program ? One of top.
Somewhere around top.

I saw last 5 minutes. By accident. For sure.

Sharp contrast in squads
 
Back
Top Bottom