🏈 Are we overlooking Wisc?

[PhillyGirl]

Honestly, I think it will be a good first game and a decent litmus test of the 2015 season. Wisconsin is better than they are getting credit for. Most media outlets are calling it like this is a throwaway game for us. Give the Badgers some credit. They are gonna come into this like any other team, with the goal of beating Ala-freakin'-bama on national TV. They are gonna have a lot of fight, and they are talented. I definitely don't think it is the match up they planned for (as uagrad93 said), but it's still gonna be a good game .. at least, until we start to pull away :bama2:

 

[BamaBoySince89]

Think Michigan game 2012. That's my gut feeling.

I'm thinking the same thing, and plus we were hearing the "are we overlooking Michigan" nonsense. Bama by 14+

 

[PhillyGirl]

#2 Bama vs. #8 Michigan .. So many fears of an upset and a close game, and fears of Denard Robinson .. End result? 41 - 14, wooooooo. Good game.

These pics sum it up for me .. Crushing the opposition, and running away with it.

 

[OldPlayer]

I keep hearing all this talk about playing 2 maybe 3 QBs this weekend......Like we will be so far ahead that there will be a lot of mop up duty... I think you guys are forgetting how good Wisc is. There backup RB to Melvin Gordon rushed for almost 1,000 yards last year......and he was the BACK UP! Nick said Wisc had one of the best Defenses of the year last year. I just don't like all this talk about playing 2-3 QBs. Makes it sound like this game will be a cake walk and i don't think it will. They lost to LSU by 4 points in there opening last year.....and should have won! They took the barn to overtime and barely lost to them at the end of the year and should have beat them. IDK....just nerves maybe....??

The fans overlook everybody. As for the QBs, playing 2-3 QBs doesn't mean Alabama is dipping down into the depth chart to play the scrubs. The QBs are very close in capability and playing the #2 or #3 guy (they should be #1a and #1b) won't be much of a drop off. CNS may change QBs to give the offense a spark or just to continue the QB battle.

 

[252BAMA]

The fans overlook everybody. As for the QBs, playing 2-3 QBs doesn't mean Alabama is dipping down into the depth chart to play the scrubs. The QBs are very close in capability and playing the #2 or #3 guy (they should be #1a and #1b) won't be much of a drop off. CNS may change QBs to give the offense a spark or just to continue the QB battle.

Exactly! Did Bama face tOSU's #3QB? No, they faced #1C. In fact it could be said that Bama has "one-upped" tOSU. IMO, Bama's QBs are #'s 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, and 1E.

 

[Killer Instinct]

I watched Wiskey several times last year. You can dare Stave to beat us and he can't. At least the guy I watched last year couldn't. You can sit on the run and walk 7-8 into the box and be safe doing it. That will be their undoing. They are too one dimensional. That one dimension is very good, but if you can match them talent-wise, they struggle. The key is our passing game. If Mr. X at QB for the good guys can hit a few and keep their defense honest, they are in trouble. If Mr. X can't deliver, we will struggle with them. It's that simple.

 

[Harry Elephante]

Stave sucks harder than a Baton Rouge whore.

 

[planomateo]

Negative.