Yes, and no. If they are recruiting head to head against Florida? No. There is no advantage.Only impacts players at Georgia and Georgia Tech (big schools). Does this give them an unfair recruiting advantage?
or TennesseeYes, and no. If they are recruiting head to head against Florida? No. There is no advantage.
UGA is competing against A&M, TX, UT, Vandy, and UF (just within the SEC) here. If this passes in Georgia, expect it to pass in other states as 1/3rd of the SEC schools would have this benefit.or Tennessee
Income taxes are so frigging stupid...
It won’t be evaluated on a state-by-state basis. Does it give an advantage at all? Georgia schools compete with Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, South Carolina, Virginia, Ohio, California, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania schools and more. If NIL is treated as income, Florida, Tennessee, Nevada, Texas, Wyoming, Washington already don’t have state income taxes.Yes, and no. If they are recruiting head to head against Florida? No. There is no advantage.
A player has an offer from Florida and Georgia and he's looking at his possibilities with NIL income. In GA, he gets taxed. In FL, he doesn't. He would be evaluating his offer on a state by state basis: literally one versus another.It won’t be evaluated on a state-by-state basis. Does it give an advantage at all? Georgia schools compete with Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, South Carolina, Virginia, Ohio, California, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania schools and more. If NIL is treated as income, Florida, Tennessee, Nevada, Texas, Wyoming, Washington already don’t have state income taxes.
UGA is competing against A&M, TX, UT, Vandy, and UF (just within the SEC) here. If this passes in Georgia, expect it to pass in other states as 1/3rd of the SEC schools would have this benefit.
I know how it works. When the law was created in these no income tax states, it had nothing to do with NIL. It applied to everyone making money in the state. Georgia will need to apply the law to everyone, not just college athletes.A player has an offer from Florida and Georgia and he's looking at his possibilities with NIL income. In GA, he gets taxed. In FL, he doesn't. He would be evaluating his offer on a state by state basis: literally one versus another.
They are trying to "even the playing field" while creating an advantage over some other states: like Alabama.
In a sense it is no different than kids going to a Mississippi school and not having to deal with out of state tuition fees. It's an advantage.
I think "un-fair" recruiting advantage went out the window when Ohio State paid their players $20 million or so last year.Only impacts players at Georgia and Georgia Tech (big schools). Does this give them an unfair recruiting advantage?
Your thought, or is that legislation?Georgia will need to apply the law to everyone, not just college athletes.
The number being floated around for the cap on revenue sharing is just under 20 million per school. If St. Aunt Mary's Northwestern doesn't have the 20 million, but St. Uncle Rico South does...advantage for Rico and his Mountaineers.I think "un-fair" recruiting advantage went out the window when Ohio State paid their players $20 million or so last year.
As a Georgia resident I’ll be pissed if a law benefits a specific group over others.Your thought, or is that legislation?
I can understand that.As a Georgia resident I’ll be pissed if a law benefits a specific group over others.