The SEC needs to trade Arkansas to the Big 12 in exchange for Texas A&M. For most of the same reasons listed for Texas going to the Big Televen.
A&M would give the SEC a presence in the huge Texas TV markets.
The SEC made a play for Texas with the 1990s expansion to twelve teams, but was blocked by political interest there concerned (rightly so in my opinion) over what would happen to all the other Texas schools in the SWC with Texas removed from that league. With the subsequent demise of the SWC and the other state programs better protected in the more diverse Big 12 those political concerns must no longer be present. Now, if both Texas and A&M are removed, there might be some issues over how long Texas Tech and Baylor might be valued by the remaining Big 12 members. The state of Texas would have more interest in the Big Televen with Texas residing there and the SEC with A&M in our ranks than any league with Tech and Baylor the drawing card.
Not sure if I have shared it here before, but Jeremy Foley a few years ago was putting together a plan to take Florida and Georgia to the ACC in the development of a 16-team super conference that dominated the entire Atlantic Coast from Boston to Miami - and all parts between. The plan included bringing in two other teams from a list of Alabama OR Tennessee (but not both) as one new member and one of either Syracuse, Temple (hey, the leagues needed another football doormat to give the big boys a break every now and then and that would put Philly in play for basketball), Pitt, Louisville, and (of course) Notre Dame. The idea was to split into two divisions based on N-S geography, play a nine game football conference slate (7 in conference and two from the other side), a 20 game basketball schedule (14 with home-and-away with your division mates and six games from the other side), and the other sports mostly playing only a divisional schedule until the post season (kind of like a permanent playoff format heading into the NCAA postseason). Florida and Georgia were all for the move, but the UF President nixed the idea as too risky for football (although if Alabama and Syracuse had been the other two additions, the TV draw for a league with Boston College, Syracuse, Virginia Tech, Clemson, Alabama, Georgia, Georgia Tech, Florida, Florida State, and Miami would have been incredible all across the country). We had some interesting numbers on the projections board.
Frankly, as long as Alabama was included in such a development, I would be all for it still today. Removing Florida and Georgia and either Alabama or Tennessee from the SEC would all but kill this league. If we were left behind and the league could not pull in both Texas and A&M our program would be badly crippled. Us, and the other two, bolting for the expanded ACC would leave Auburn, Tennessee, LSU (who would probably move to the Big 12), and the Mississippi schools to their own histories and limited TV draws. And that would break my little bitty heart. Hell, if we were left behind, we would be better off becoming an independent like Notre Dame - or ourselves seek refuge in the Big 12.