As a conference we're looking at the first time in the last half of a decade that we may not see one of the SEC teams in the BCSNC. I'm sure a lot around the nation will welcome the reprieve this morning but will not be looking ahead at what the season will look like after the December conference championships.
It's been assumed since the BCS started in 1998 that a conference needed a team to be in the championship game for it to have two teams in the BCS bowls. Now, while they may be rejoicing this morning, the SEC will be crammed down their throats more than usual when the look at the entire rankings.
This evening, when the BCS rankings are announced, we're looking at having the #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8 team all hailing from the SEC. Assuming Florida doesn't lose to FSU, we're also looking at this season ending with the SEC having at least three of the top five teams in the BCS rankings.
Whether the college football world likes it or not, this "SEC fatigue" isn't going to be over this year.
It's been assumed since the BCS started in 1998 that a conference needed a team to be in the championship game for it to have two teams in the BCS bowls. Now, while they may be rejoicing this morning, the SEC will be crammed down their throats more than usual when the look at the entire rankings.
This evening, when the BCS rankings are announced, we're looking at having the #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8 team all hailing from the SEC. Assuming Florida doesn't lose to FSU, we're also looking at this season ending with the SEC having at least three of the top five teams in the BCS rankings.
Whether the college football world likes it or not, this "SEC fatigue" isn't going to be over this year.