🏈 Is it fair for a coach to plan to leave right after NSD without telling recruits first

RTB X Bot

Member
Say a college coach is offered a new position with another team shortly before National Signing Day and decides to move on. Is he obligated to tell the high school football player he's been recruiting?

The answer, technically, is no.

This year, many high school players were affected by the decisions of college coaches moving on to other jobs. The most high-profile examples are three highly-coveted prospects -- five-star CeCe Jefferson of Baker County, Florida, four-star Mike Weber of Detroit and four-star Roquan Smith of Montezuma, Georgia. Jefferson and Smith announced their choices on national TV, only to later realize their position coaches had bolted for new jobs, with those coaches waiting either until or right after Signing Day to make that news public.

Weber faxed his letter to Ohio State before he found out Stan Drayton was leaving the Ohio State staff, which contractually bound Weber to the Buckeyes unless he elected to transfer and sit out a year. Jefferson and Smith did not fax their letters on Signing Day to Florida and UCLA, respectively, so when news broke about their primary recruiters, they had more wiggle room.

"The way I see it, 70 or 80 percent of why kids go to a school are because of the coach," said Leo Jefferson, father of CeCe Jefferson. "If a kid is going to go somewhere and play football, the coach is going to be a big part of the kid's life. And kids don't always have a dad to lean on, so they lean on these coaches. (A coach) is going to come to my house for 2-3 years and then it's time for my kid to sign and he leaves?

"How is that fair?"

Leo Jefferson said he and CeCe were never told by the Gators' staff of the possibility defensive line coach Terrell Williams would leave for the Dolphins. When CeCe didn't send his NLI immediately after his announcement, Leo was outspoken as to why.

"I took a beating in the media," Jefferson said. "But if you're recruiting a kid who can impact your program, or any kid for that matter, the bottom line is: Let us know. We want the opportunity to know what's going on. Give us the benefit of the doubt."

The benefit of doubt could be an obvious reason why Williams, Drayton and UCLA's Jeff Ulbrich didn't announce they were leaving until after the recruiting cycle.

"From a timing perspective, it was horrendous," Rivals.com national recruiting director Mike Farrell said. "For all these (assistant coaches) to leave right after National Signing Day makes it very clear they all knew and just lied."



CeCe Jefferson eventually decided to stay with his Florida commitment.
Though CeCe Jeffreson ultimately signed his NLI with Florida, Smith -- as of Thursday -- still hasn't signed. Smith said he learned of Ulbrich's departure after Smith announced he was signing with UCLA.

Smith said he wasn't only unaware Ulbrich was leaving the Bruins, but he was also led to believe otherwise.

"Coach Ulbrich did say that coach Dan Quinn (head coach of the Atlanta Falcons) had called him the night before, but he had declined the job offer," Smith told Jake Reuse of UGASports.com.

Ulbrich was formally announced as part of the Falcons staff on Monday and now Smith has changed his recruiting strategy entirely. Smith's high school coach at Macon County, Larry Harold, is advising Smith not to sign a letter of intent. Instead, he can sign a financial aid agreement, which would bind the school to the player -- the opposite of an NLI, which binds the player to the school.

"I think you might see some more kids (in 2016) do what Roquan is doing and just sign financial aid papers," Harold said. "That way if something crazy happens, you're not bound to the school. I don't think every kid is going to have this option, but the top tier kids can."

Harold said he's not adopting a new recruiting philosophy because of Smith's ordeal.

"This is just another way to protect the kids," Harold said. "If I'm fortunate enough to have another four- or five-star player, I'm going to let them know we don't have to sign a NLI. It's just another option I will educate them about."

Farrell is hopeful college programs will solve the problem on the front end.

"I think this is a situation where it's starting to catch up with (programs). You'll see a lot of honesty (from them) moving forward," he said.

Weber's recruitment is a good example of that. When Drayton left the Buckeyes the day after NSD, it left Weber's camp unsettled to say the least. His coach at Cass Tech, Thomas Wilcher, said hearing from Urban Meyer was the difference in Weber feeling comfortable with his Ohio State commitment.

"He showed good faith," Wilcher said, who has coached at Cass Tech since 1997. "And he made it very clear that won't happen again."

That's a good thing for the Buckeyes too, if they want to continue recruiting Cass Tech, which has sent 10 players to Michigan, under Wilcher. New Wolverines coach Jim Harbaugh recently tweeted what has been widely interpreted as a shot at Meyer for the Buckeyes' handling of Drayton's departure.



As Wilcher notes, it's OK for a college coach to move on, but he believes there's a fair way to go about it.

"Any coach should want to elevate and better themselves," he said. "You want to be at the highest level -- that's the goal. All coaches want that. But I feel coaches should also have ethics. That will always play a better role in recruiting. If a coach is leaving, get another coach on the staff to step in and build rapport so the kid is comfortable with the transition. Keep it going and just be upfront. Show love and honesty, so the kid believes you. He's the one leaving home and leaving behind his friends and family."
 
Commit to a university, not a coach.

i can agree with this, but i also think coaches need to be truthful and forthcoming about information.

the truth can go a long way, in my opinion. if you plan to leave after national signing day, then tell the recruits your plans. worst case scenario, they commit elsewhere. but you keep your dignity and your morals are intact.
 
Last edited:
The ideal is to commit to a school rather than a coach, but the reality is that many kids seeing college football as merely a conduit to the NFL. An assistant coach involved in the recruiting of a prospect is being extremely unethical if he knows he is leaving and doesn't tell the recruit. Just as it is very unethical to not let the prospect know as soon as you know it, that there will be or might be a gray shirt involved. Of course, in the times we live in, ethics is not a highly valued trait.
 
The relationship is built with the coach. Trust and honesty goes a LONG way in building that relationship. I understand the committing to a school and all, BUT the school isn't the one pumping smoke up a kids ass telling him he will get him to the NFL. I was fortunate when I was recruited by BAMA. Coach Jimmy Fuller recruited me. He was honest and straight forward about my situation in regards to an injury I suffered and the availability of a scholarship. After Coach Curry left my first year, Coach Fuller remained and gave the other coaches an idea of the kids he had recruited.
 
The ideal is to commit to a school rather than a coach, but the reality is that many kids seeing college football as merely a conduit to the NFL. An assistant coach involved in the recruiting of a prospect is being extremely unethical if he knows he is leaving and doesn't tell the recruit. Just as it is very unethical to not let the prospect know as soon as you know it, that there will be or might be a gray shirt involved. Of course, in the times we live in, ethics is not a highly valued trait.


Very well put! Yes, coaches need to be straight with kids, but this as this is a conduit to the NFL for so many, this is also the same for the coaches. Any better offer that's out there, they'll go get. Just look at Garrick McGee who thought being an OC was being better than a HC at a crappy school.
 
The whole thing is ironic. Players can't change teams w/o having to sit out for a season; coaches can change teams anytime. I do think coaches should be upfront with recruits if they are planning on leaving, but only if they know for certain they are going to leave. No reason to mention something that might not happen in my opinion, sometimes cause more bad than good.

I definitely believe in committing to the school, not the coaches based on how the coaching landscape changes. I don't like it, but I feel as a recruit it's the best way to look at things.

And it is the same in the business world. Reorgs happen all the time, there are alot of things you can't control.
 
Back
Top Bottom