šŸˆ Freeh Report: PSU hid 'critical facts'

STATE COLLEGE, Pa. -- Hall of Fame coach Joe Paterno and other senior officials "concealed critical facts" about Jerry Sandusky's child abuse because they were worried about bad publicity, an internal investigation into the scandal concluded.

The 267-page report released Thursday is the result of an eight-month inquiry by former FBI director Louis Freeh, hired by university trustees weeks after Sandusky was arrested in November to look into what has become one of sports' biggest scandals.

The report concluded that Paterno, president Graham Spanier, athletic director Tim Curley and vice president Gary Schultz "failed to protect against a child sexual predator harming children for over a decade."

"In order to avoid the consequences of bad publicity, the most powerful leaders at the university -- Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley -- repeatedly concealed critical facts relating to Sandusky's child abuse," the report said.

Sexual abuse might have been prevented if university officials had banned him from bringing children onto campus after a 1998 inquiry, the report said. Despite their knowledge of the police probe into Sandusky showering with a boy in a football locker room, Spanier, Paterno, Curley and Schultz took no action to limit his access to campus, the report said.

The May 1998 complaint by a woman whose son came home with wet hair after showering with Sandusky didn't result in charges at the time. The report says Schultz was worried the matter could be opening "Pandora's box."

Officials later did bar him from bringing children to campus.

The report added that investigators found no evidence linking Sandusky's 1999 retirement to the 1998 investigation.
A chapter in the report issued on Thursday says Spanier promised the prestigious "emeritus" status to Sandusky, but others voiced concerns it wasn't appropriate.

The report discloses Spanier also approved a lump-sum payment of $168,000 to Sandusky, which other officials said may have been unprecedented.

Sandusky's retirement soon after the investigation has prompted questions about whether the two were linked.
The report also singled out the revered Penn State football program -- one built on the motto "success with honor" -- for criticism. It says Paterno and university leaders allowed Sandusky to retire in 1999, "not as a suspected child predator, but as a valued member of the Penn State football legacy, with future 'visibility' at Penn State'," allowing him to groom victims.

Sandusky is awaiting sentencing after being convicted of 45 criminal counts. The scandal led to the ouster of Paterno and the school's president.

Key Points of Freeh Report

• Paterno and others showed "callous and shocking disregard for child victims."
• Evidence shows Paterno, Spanier, Schultz and Curley did know of 1998 investigation and Paterno "failed to take any action."
• Penn State "concealed critical facts ... in order to avoid the consequences of bad publicity."
• Penn State changed its plan and did not alert authorities of Sandusky's alleged actions after consulting with Paterno.
• Penn State failed to adhere to federal law requiring collecting and reporting crimes such as Sandusky committed.

In a press conference later Thursday morning, Freeh said the "most powerful men at Penn State failed" to take any steps for 14 years, calling out Paterno, Spanier, Curley and Schultz.

Trustee Anthony Lubrano, a critic of the board's dismissal of Paterno in November, said the board was still formulating a response.

Sandusky's trial last month included gut-wrenching testimony from eight young men who said he abused them as boys, sometimes on campus, and included testimony that showed he used his prestige as a university celebrity to manipulate the children.

By contrast, Freeh's team focused on Penn State and what its employees did -- or did not do -- to protect children.
More than 400 current or former school employees were interviewed since November, including nearly everyone associated with the football program under Paterno. The Hall of Fame coach died of lung cancer in January at age 85, without telling Freeh's team his account of what happened.

With the report now complete, the NCAA said Penn State now must address four key questions concerning "institutional control and ethics policies," as outlined in a letter sent to the school last fall.

"Penn State's response to the letter will inform our next steps, including whether or not to take further action," said Bob Williams, the NCAA's vice president of communications. "We expect Penn State's continued cooperation in our examination of these issues."

The U.S. Department of Education is examining whether the school violated the Clery Act, which requires reporting of certain crimes on campus, including ones of a sexual nature. The report said Penn State's "awareness and interest" in Clery Act compliance was "significantly lacking."

Only one form used to report such crimes was completed on campus from 2007 through 2011, according to the Freeh findings. And no record exists of Paterno, Curley or assistant coach Mike McQueary reporting that McQueary saw Sandusky in a shower with a boy in 2001, as they would be obligated to do under the Clery Act.
As of last November, Penn State's policies for Clery compliance were still in draft form and had not been implemented, the report found.

U.S. Department of Education said it was still examining whether Penn State violated the Clery Act, but declined to comment on Freeh's report.

Mary Krupa, an 18-year-old Penn State freshman who grew up in State College, said the conclusion that the school's highest officials were derelict in protecting children didn't shake her love of the town or the school."The actions of five or six people don't reflect on the hundreds of thousands" of students and faculty who make up the Penn State community, she said while walking through the student union building on campus.
 
[h=2]Tweets <small class="view-toggler">All / No replies</small>[/h]

<small class="time"> 1h </small> Charles Robinson ā€<img alt="" src="https://ih0.redbubble.net/image.567420689.0744/pp,650x642-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.u2.jpg" style="width: 75px; height: 100px;" />@</s>CharlesRobinson
Everything is offically in play now for Penn State. This report opens the door for all manner of sanctioning - criminal, civil & NCAA alike.

Expand





<small class="time"> 1h </small> Charles Robinson ā€<img alt="" src="https://ih0.redbubble.net/image.567420689.0744/pp,650x642-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.u2.jpg" style="width: 75px; height: 100px;" />@</s>CharlesRobinson
Lack of centralized compliance + criminal concealment = more than enough for the NCAA to dig into Penn State with every available shovel.

Expand





<small class="time"> 1h </small> Charles Robinson ā€<img alt="" src="https://ih0.redbubble.net/image.567420689.0744/pp,650x642-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.u2.jpg" style="width: 75px; height: 100px;" />@</s>CharlesRobinson
The Freeh report's criticisms of Penn State's compliance structure provides footing for a major investigation by the NCAA into PSU athletics

Expand





<small class="time"> 1h </small> Charles Robinson ā€<img alt="" src="https://ih0.redbubble.net/image.567420689.0744/pp,650x642-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.u2.jpg" style="width: 75px; height: 100px;" />@</s>CharlesRobinson
This is often a major example of lack of institutional control. RT <img alt="" src="https://ih0.redbubble.net/image.567420689.0744/pp,650x642-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.u2.jpg" style="width: 75px; height: 100px;" />@</s>BryanDFischer Report states PSU has no centralized compliance office.
 
Whats gonna happen as a result of this? Can the NCAA hit them with the death penalty (no question this is worse than paying players to play)...just not sure if they have this ability based on what I've seen thus far (albeit, I haven't read everything)

What governs a school system - meaning what can happen to the school system to reprimand them?
 
The NCAA may hit them, but by the time the feds and the state finish with them and the officials involved and they settle all the civil suits by the victims anything the NCAA does will seem relatively minor.

It ssounds like PSU had their own GOBN in the administration. While the GOBN at U of A caused some problems, we are fortunate indeed that there was never a cover up of anything of this scope.
 
No centralized compliance office?! Seriously? From a major university? Wow!

One of the moves Ohio State made recently was making their compliance department "independent," so to speak, from the Athletic Dept. According to how I remember the story, those handling football were literally inside the football complex and therein reporting to the football administration.

In essence, OSU made a similar move in the last year.

The main point here is there isn't a set standard across the board for how a school runs their compliance.
 
Wouldn't these actions be out of NCAA's field? This seems to be more of a Federal issue.

Either way bye-bye Paterno legacy, they're now debating on whether they should keep statue of Joe Paterno at the school.
 
They could just turn the statue so it could look the other way. Sorry it may still be too early for that.

I seen this posted somewhere else, but haven't seen it posted here: "The Letter." Very interesting.
http://cbschicago.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/pennstatencaaletter2.pdf

I hadn't seen that letter. Thanks.

Too early? Perhaps. Funny? No doubt. It's one of those times you snicker, close your eyes, bow your head and shake it back and forth. You know...a little ashamed to laugh but just can't help it?
 
I don't know that Freeh should be the end all be all about this. I'm not saying Penn State isn't at fault here, obviously without Freeh having is face in it they were at fault. I'm not sure why people all of a sudden say "this really hurts Paterno's legacy" if before this you didn't think he knew about it then you had your head in the sand. There was never any doubt in my mind he knew about it. Paterno's lying to the grand jury could be excused since he was damn near 90 and recalling every fact about things is a bit ignorant to expect. But, again I'm not giving him a free pass.

As for the NCAA they might do something and more than likely will just for the face value of it and how the public will look at them for doing so. But, they have no grounds to do so. This isn't an academic or athletic issue this is a moral human being issue and a federal issue and it'll be handled as a federal and civil matter.

The only reason they would remove Paterno's statue is because they want to save face with the public and media. He did a lot for that school and made them relevant, but to do something just so the public or media smiles more at you is wrong. I wouldn't go naming anything more after him or anything, but I wouldn't remove the statue. What he and the other higher ups at Penn State did was wrong on every level and in both civil and federal court they should be punished to the fullest extent of the law, but for the school to do something just to make the public and the media smile is wrong.
 
I don't know that Freeh should be the end all be all about this. I'm not saying Penn State isn't at fault here, obviously without Freeh having is face in it they were at fault. I'm not sure why people all of a sudden say "this really hurts Paterno's legacy" if before this you didn't think he knew about it then you had your head in the sand. There was never any doubt in my mind he knew about it. Paterno's lying to the grand jury could be excused since he was damn near 90 and recalling every fact about things is a bit ignorant to expect. But, again I'm not giving him a free pass.

As for the NCAA they might do something and more than likely will just for the face value of it and how the public will look at them for doing so. But, they have no grounds to do so. This isn't an academic or athletic issue this is a moral human being issue and a federal issue and it'll be handled as a federal and civil matter.

The only reason they would remove Paterno's statue is because they want to save face with the public and media. He did a lot for that school and made them relevant, but to do something just so the public or media smiles more at you is wrong. I wouldn't go naming anything more after him or anything, but I wouldn't remove the statue. What he and the other higher ups at Penn State did was wrong on every level and in both civil and federal court they should be punished to the fullest extent of the law, but for the school to do something just to make the public and the media smile is wrong.

Apparently you missed the link in Post #10 above. When did the NCAA ever need grounds to do anything they wanted?

http://www.psu.edu/ur/2011/NCAA.pdf
 
There are two ways to look at this.

Should the NCAA step in and could the NCAA step in.

Of course they could. I don't think they should.

Assuming they did, what benefit is seen in the end?

Exactly my thoughts. Those actively involved in the cover up will be going to prison. The university, whose culture permitted this, is going to be paying out many millions. Joe Pa has been judged by the highest court.

Its kind of like the first Gulf War. Iraq had fired a few Scud missiles at Israel and the Israelis were itching to retaliate. The U.S. pointed out that we were flying 1000 attack sorties a day and asked the Israelis what they thought they could do that they we weren't already doing.

For PSU to get the NCAA death penalty, as some have suggested, would lead to punishing people who weren't guilty for the acts of those who were.
 
CFBW: #Indeed. RT @jjones9: What an anecdote in the lede of this Paterno column by Rick Reilly http://t.co/jl1JrzfW

@jjones9: What an anecdote in the lede of this Paterno column by Rick Reilly http://t.co/jl1JrzfW

More...


What a fool I was.

In 1986, I spent a week in State College, Pa., researching a 10-page Sports Illustrated Sportsman of the Year piece on Joe Paterno.

It was supposed to be a secret, but one night the phone in my hotel room rang. It was a Penn State professor, calling out of the blue.

"Are you here to take part in hagiography?" he said.

"What's hagiography?" I asked.

"The study of saints," he said. "You're going to be just like the rest, aren't you? You're going to make Paterno out to be a saint. You don't know him. He'll do anything to win. What you media are doing is dangerous."

Jealous egghead, I figured.

What an idiot I was.
 
There are two ways to look at this.

Should the NCAA step in and could the NCAA step in.

Of course they could. I don't think they should.

Assuming they did, what benefit is seen in the end?

Of course they shouldn't. But because they can, they will. I think they should leave it to the courts.
 
Exactly my thoughts. Those actively involved in the cover up will be going to prison. The university, whose culture permitted this, is going to be paying out many millions. Joe Pa has been judged by the highest court.

Its kind of like the first Gulf War. Iraq had fired a few Scud missiles at Israel and the Israelis were itching to retaliate. The U.S. pointed out that we were flying 1000 attack sorties a day and asked the Israelis what they thought they could do that they we weren't already doing.

For PSU to get the NCAA death penalty, as some have suggested, would lead to punishing people who weren't guilty for the acts of those who were.

I think the NCAA giving PSU the "death penalty" would be ignorant. There are thousands of student athletes that had nothing to do with the criminal enterprise that was the AD, President, Head football coach, etc and would be very unfair. PSU will pay dearly in the civil courts as they should and several people will pay in both the civil and criminal courts.

I was just telling my wife last night that had something like this gone at Alabama Nick Saban would should the dude and turn him into every outlet he needed to and if somebody tried covering it up he would freak out as should any decent human being
 
Back
Top Bottom