Found it: Cecil Hurt's article from November 20, 2006
CECIL HURT: Does Alabama have the best coach it could have?
There could be a million questions asked about Saturdayâs Alabama-Auburn game and 999,999 of them donât matter.
Forget about asking the many obvious strategic questions that came up they donât matter.
The first-quarter decision not to go for a touchdown when the offense bogged down (again) inside the Auburn 5-yard line? It doesnât matter.
The second-quarter decision to pursue a frivolous 2-point conversion (after a timeout to think about it)? It doesnât matter.
The fourth-quarter decision to go for a fourth-and-15 at the Auburn 18 with 5:17 remaining, after sending the kicking team on and (again) wasting a valuable timeout to think about it? It doesnât matter.
The swinging gate at the right end of the Alabama offensive line that allowed two crucial fumble-causing hits on John Parker Wilson? It doesnât matter.
Debate those strategic decisions what play was called, what players were in the game all you want. They had an impact on the outcome, of course, but are just symptoms that have recurred in one form or another in every single game this season, six less-than-stellar wins and now six dismal losses, including all three games in November.
To continue with the questions...
Should 6-6 Alabama accept a bowl bid, in the increasingly unlikely event that one is extended by the Independence Bowl, or one of the couple of off-brand bowls that might have an opening? It doesnât matter.
What about the inability to come back from a fourth-quarter deficit for the 19th or is it the 20th straight time? It doesnât matter.
The staggeringly consistent failure to score more than 20 points in regulation in any SEC game this season? It doesnât matter.
The 2-8 record in the last 10 SEC games? It doesnât matter.
The five straight losses to Auburn, including one Saturday that confirmed that the Tigers donât even have to play at the top of their form to win the game on Alabamaâs home turf. Certainly, AU did most of the little things better than Alabama did but their quarterback was hurting, and their defense made some mistakes. It didnât matter. Auburn now feels it can win, regardless, against Alabama, and while itâs futile to look four years down the road, one can rest assured that the Tigers have Paul Bryantâs series record of nine straight wins prominently on their orange-and-blue To Do list.
Some day, there will be time to reflect on all those things. This morning isnât that time.
There is just one question that matters today. I can ask it, or you can ask it, but it doesnât matter unless the right person at the University of Alabama asks it.
Does the Crimson Tide football program have the best head coach it could have?
If the answer is âyesâ, then nothing more needs to be said.
If the answer is âno,â then there are a few follow-up questions, like âwhy?â and âwhat is to be done about that?âÂ
No other considerations should make any difference. Yes, there is a short list of reasons to keep Mike Shula as the Tideâs head coach in the wake of a 6-6 season and a fifth straight loss to Auburn. Most of them are financial, or perceptual. It would cost a lot of money $4 million, give or take a little to buy him out.
Or it might be that, since Shula took the job when Alabama was in dire straits, it wouldnât be gentlemanly to make a move, even as the gap between UA and the leagueâs top programs seems to be widening, not narrowing.
Or it might just be the path of least resistance to simply stick with the status quo, to not go about the tough chore of attracting a proven replacement.
But unless the reason is that he is the best coach Alabama could have right now, do the above considerations really matter?
Will someone at the University of Alabama actually ask the hard question?
One has to hope so. Itâs been debated over the past few weeks and, despite what some have said, there was no firm answer reached before the Auburn game.
Shula himself said there would be âan evaluationÂâ of the wreckage of the 2006 season, a reconnaissance of the smoldering ruins that would involve his own evaluation of the coaching staff and would âprobablyâ involve Athletic Director Mal Moore and University President Dr. Robert Witt.
No one is surprised that the higher-ups want answers, ones which should have been demanded before now, frankly. In that process, perhaps Shula can make his case, and explain how things that did not get one iota better from the first week of the season to the last week, will get better with another spring, or another offseason.
Perhaps heâll recommend staff changes he made a postgame allusion to Tennesseeâs improvement from 2005 to 2006 that clearly begged the question of a new offensive coordinator, at a minimum.
Things like staff changes, or philosophy changes, or recruiting changes, are all trivial details, though, when compared to the one important question.
To repeat it: Does the Crimson Tide football program have the best head coach it could have?
It isnât an easy question, even if increasingly frustrated UA fans have a quick answer ready. Itâs tough to factor out all the variables, like Mike Shula being a good person (which he is). But itâ got to be asked. It probably should have been asked and answered already, but the deadline for a response has now arrived, inescapably.
For Alabamaâs sake, it better be the right answer. Because if it isnât, then the question youâll be hearing a few years from now might very well be, âWhatever happened to Alabama football?â and what is far worse is the answer that might come hauntingly back,
âIt doesnât matter.âÂ