Well, Outlaw pretty much answered your post, but I'm going to say this as well.
I said this year, Tim Tebow was the best player. Not the most athletic, but the best player. Look at his stats, Tebow was great all year long, while McFadden did have some bad games. There is one stat that really sticks out to me when I compare Tebow and McFadden. Rushing TDs: Tim Tebow 22 - Darren McFadden 15.
You never saw Tim Tebow make his team win when it seemed they that they couldn't? Tebow could take over a game this year like no one I have seen before! McFadden could do this too, but where was he against Auburn? 43 yards rushing and 0 TDs isn't exactly taking over a game. :? He also had other poor games (*cough* Miss. St) whereas Tebow played consistently great all year long.
Are you being serious? Colt Brennan couldn't run Coach Meyer's offense the same or better than Tebow. Brennan wouldn't last half a year running that offense against the competition Tebow faces, IMO.
Yes, McFadden has done great things at Arkansas these last 3 years....but what does that have to do with the 2007 Heisman Trophy?
Last year Florida was better because they had MUCH more talent surrounding Chris Leak. Look at how many players they lost from last year's team!
Colt Brennan had a great season last year, I will not argue that. However, just because he didn't win the Heisman last year doesn't mean that Tebow shouldn't win it this year. :?
I personally don't care for Tim Tebow. However, he had a fantastic year, and he deserved to win the Heisman Trophy. I'm not going to say he shouldn't have won just because I don't like him. :roll:
