Tim Tebow never had a bad game.
DMac had more than one bad game.
Tebow played hurt.
DMac didn't play hurt.
Tebow put up better numbers.
Pretty easy decision.
Yeah, pretty sure he said he was the best pure athlete. Means the same thing as being more athletic.
Are you serious?! Colt Brennan could be a beast in Florida's offense? First off, CUM would NOT want CB to run his offense. Second off, just no. Personally, I think CB could not last three games facing the people Tim Tebow did, much less do what he did. CB runs an offense that fits him against abysmal competition (go and play somebody worthy, play more than two teams with winning records, don't try to get only home home series against big schools, don't be scared to go off and play a big school, etc.), and Tim runs a system which benefits him against much superior competition.
You make arguments which are based on strict opinion. You don't use numbers, you don't use anything solid. You keep bringing up the argument that DMac did all these great things for three years. That's great and all, maybe he should be awarded the 2005-2007 Heisman Trophy. You keep making the argument that DMac should get it for beating the #1 team in the nation. No, he got a victory for beating the #1 team in the nation for beating the #1 team in the nation. You win the Heisman by performing superior throughout the whole year. You keep arguing that DMac should win it because last year UF was better with Leak as their primary QB. You fail to mention that UF had a much better all around team last year, especially on defense. The Heisman goes to the best college football player. You have to look at PERFORMANCE, and T squared's performance game in and game out has been solid. DMac has been stopped during two or three different games. You fail to mention that Tebow plays hurt while DMac sat against us because of cramps.
I just do NOT understand how people don't see that Tebow had the better year. :?
