🏈 A story that's been developing all day: Northwestern football players attempt for form a union for

TerryP

Successfully wasting your time since...
Staff
I'm left thinking about the upcoming playoffs, all the talk about how much money it'll bring in, and find myself left with one thought: Be careful what you wish for.

The comment in this tweet from Jeremy Fowler is, well, disturbing.

"Digesting player union presser, and gotta say, scene was surreal. A Big Ten QB was on stage with a steelworker rep talking about labor laws
"




Kain Colter and a group of Northwestern players are beginning the process of forming a labor union to represent college athletes.

According to ESPN's Outside the Lines, Ramogi Huma, president of the National College Players Association, filed a petition in Chicago on behalf of the players with the National Labor Relations Board.


If the group is certified by the NLRB, it will be called the College Athletes Players Association (CAPA). Huma, Colter and former UMass basketball player Luke Bonner created the group with support from the United Steelworkers.


More details, via OTL
:
"This is about finally giving college athletes a seat at the table," said Huma, a former UCLA linebacker, who created the NCPA as an advocacy group in 2001. "Athletes deserve an equal voice when it comes to their physical, academic and financial protections."


Huma told "Outside The Lines" that the move to unionize players at Northwestern started with quarterback Kain Colter, who reached out to him last spring and asked for help in giving athletes representation in their effort to improve the conditions under which they play NCAA sports. Colter became a leading voice in regular NCPA-organized conference calls among players from around the country.

Huma, Colter and the NCPA organized the "All Players United" movement in the 2013 season that resulted in several players from Northwestern, Georgia and Georgia Tech displaying #APU on their uniforms.


Huma told OTL that the goals of CAPA will be the same as the NCPA; looking for representation in the decision-making process of college athletics to improve conditions for student-athletes. The group has advocated for multi-year scholarships and has called for guaranteed scholarships for players who can no longer compete due to injury or medical issues.

"A lot of people will think this is all about money; it's not," Colter told the Chicago Tribune on Tuesday morning. "We're asking for a seat at the table to get our voice heard."

Colter to Trib on unionizing: “We're not expecting a decision to be made right away. It might ... go all the way to the Supreme Court.”
— Teddy Greenstein (@TeddyGreenstein) January 28, 2014


Leaders of the NCPA and CAPA will hold a press conference Tuesday in downtown Chicago to discuss the petition and unionization efforts.

According to NCPAnow.org, the group has 11 specific goals.
1. Minimize college athletes' brain trauma risks.
2. Raise the scholarship amount.
3. Prevent players from being stuck paying sports-related medical expenses.
4. Increase graduation rates.
5. Protect educational opportunities for student-athletes in good standing.
6. Prohibit universities from using a permanent injury suffered during athletics as a reason to reduce/eliminate a scholarship.
7. Establish and enforce uniform safety guidelines in all sports to help prevent serious injuries and avoidable deaths.
8. Eliminate restrictions on legitimate employment and players ability to directly benefit from commercial opportunities.
9. Prohibit the punishment of college athletes that have not committed a violation.
10. Guarantee that college athletes are granted an athletic release from their university if they wish to transfer schools.
11. Allow college athletes of all sports the ability to transfer schools one time without punishment.


Previously, the NCPA flew a banner over the Rose Bowl before the BCS National Championship game that read "All Players United for Concussion Reform. Wake Up NCAA!"

The NCAA responded Tuesday, in a statement from Donald Remy, chief legal officer: "This union-backed attempt to turn student-athletes into employees undermines the purpose of college: an education.

Student-athletes are not employees, and their participation in college sports is voluntary. We stand for all student-athletes, not just those the unions want to professionalize.

"Many student athletes are provided scholarships and many other benefits for their participation. There is no employment relationship between the NCAA, its affiliated institutions or student-athletes.

"Student-athletes are not employees within any definition of the National Labor Relations Act or the Fair Labor Standards Act. We are confident the National Labor Relations Board will find in our favor, as there is no right to organize student-athletes."

Northwestern subsequently issued its own statement, saying in part: "We are pleased to note that the Northwestern students involved in this effort emphasized that they are not unhappy with the University, the football program or their treatment here, but are raising the concerns because of the importance of these issues nationally.

"Northwestern believes that our student-athletes are not employees and collective bargaining is therefore not the appropriate method to address these concerns. However, we agree that the health and academic issues being raised by our student-athletes and others are important ones that deserve further consideration."
 
[MENTION=11338]CrimsonPirate[/MENTION], I think you just like using the new feature. That's why you asked the question. :bluebiggrin:

Glad to see you back on here quite a bit, you have been missed.

You need to start making plans to come up in April for A-day. Would love to see you and the grandson again.
 
I think this is opening a can of worms that would be uncontrollable. I can see it being like any other major entity, where it becomes political (good ol' boy network) and will ruin college athletics.


You take this story, and add in the O'Bannon trial that's ongoing? We've all wanted the NCAA dismantled (from its current form) but do we really want what it might become?
 
<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: dbtech_usertag_mention --> @CrimsonPirate <!-- END TEMPLATE: dbtech_usertag_mention -->, I think you just like using the new feature. That's why you asked the question. :bluebiggrin:

Glad to see you back on here quite a bit, you have been missed.

You need to start making plans to come up in April for A-day. Would love to see you and the grandson again.

I'm not sure I'm even using the new feature right. Thanks for the invite. Maybe we can make it, although it's hard to get that boy away from his XBox. By the way, he's 20 now and looks like he could play on the D-line. No, he looks like he could BE the D-line.
 
Sizing up Northwestern players' attempt to unionize; more mail

Players want labor rights. Nebraska may be settling. Sizing up the college landscape in the Mailbag.
8mVBE7TzKqo

What outcome do you expect from Kain Colter and his fellow players' effort to unionize Northwestern's football team? Is there any chance a formal organization recognized by the NCAA will result?
-- Foster, Providence, R.I.

I recommend reading my colleague Zac Ellis' Q&A with our resident sports law expert, Michael McCann, who raises many interesting points about why it would be logistically difficult for athletes to form any sort of national union (mostly because of the differences in various states' laws regarding public school "employees"). Colter, whose unique knack for activism is refreshing, has said the NCAA, not Northwestern, is the players' target. (Colter called the organization "a dictatorship.") But a union negotiates with an employer, not the employer's membership association. Even if Northwestern's football team unionized, there's not much that the school could negotiate with it under an employer-employee dynamic; after all, the school -- like the athletes -- falls under the NCAA's purview.


Realistically, this is likely the beginning of a protracted legal fight, with the school and the NCAA contending that athletes aren't employees. But it's still a potentially revolutionary, if largely symbolic, moment. Given that college athletes enter and leave the system within four to five years, and given that the overwhelming majority of them are far more immersed in such things as Instagram and Call of Duty than in issues of NCAA governance, I've long been skeptical that they would ever mount some sort of organized movement. But then I attended the NCAA convention earlier this month, where Duke lacrosse player Maddie Salamone -- representing the organization's largely ceremonial Student-Athlete Advisory Committee -- got up in front of 800 Division I administrators and lamented, "The student-athlete voice is not as meaningful as we have been led to believe in the past." And now this.


Interestingly, most of the issues Colter's proposed union says it's pressing for -- cost-of-attendance stipends, better medical protection and post-career medical costs, a trust fund to help former players return to finish their degrees -- mirror those the major conferences were already hoping to address with their push for more NCAA legislative power. So it may be that progress happens on those specific issues long before any resolution about unionization. But in the bigger picture, Northwestern's players could still help drive home a larger point, similar to Salamone's, that athletes deserve a greater voice in a system in which they currently have none.





Read More Here...
 
Northwestern educated or not, these guys have no real clue what they're getting into. Paying the dues was an excellent comment. I just see what these unions due in real society and they simply don't work, over budget, the furthest thing from a time saver, always wanting more etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom