TerryP Successfully wasting your time since... Staff Apr 20, 2008 #1 of 3 The SEC's #'s/ranking... 1,2,3,4,6,7,13,14,25,47,48,67 What struck me when I saw this was USCw at 48 (what if they weren't playing Ohio St. next year,) OU at 46, ND at 70. UT at 67 was interesting as well. LINK
The SEC's #'s/ranking... 1,2,3,4,6,7,13,14,25,47,48,67 What struck me when I saw this was USCw at 48 (what if they weren't playing Ohio St. next year,) OU at 46, ND at 70. UT at 67 was interesting as well. LINK
E EuroTide Verified Member Member Apr 20, 2008 #2 of 3 i got it right when this is used to messure the shedule strenght right? :roll: kinda confused right now. I see UW having a hard shedule year in and out, they should get they programm back where it belongs and prolly was when those shedules were set up.
i got it right when this is used to messure the shedule strenght right? :roll: kinda confused right now. I see UW having a hard shedule year in and out, they should get they programm back where it belongs and prolly was when those shedules were set up.
TerryP Successfully wasting your time since... Staff Apr 20, 2008 #3 of 3 Part of it is used to determine strength of schedule. You have to also take into account returning starters, home vs road games, coaching changes...
Part of it is used to determine strength of schedule. You have to also take into account returning starters, home vs road games, coaching changes...
