I just this morning read the actual blog posted by Dodd. And the best thing you can say is the post is a dud.
No names. No facts of any kind.
Good gosh, how do people who write that tripe get a job and keep a job? Has 'journalism' really fallen that low?
Of course, this is 'CBS' we are talking about. A network that allowed its network news anchor go on the air with faked documents to use as proof that a sitting president was AWOL from his military duty some 30 years earlier. Why would anyone think they would hold one of their 'reporters' accountable for something as trivial as this story.
In the midst of the greatest revolution in information technology it is becoming HARDER to find truth and facts in journalism instead of EASIER. I can understand the clutter coming from any idiot with a PC and an internet link creating static, but good gosh the most static comes from the supposedly credible media.
Sorry for the rant, this probably belongs in the politics forum, but this 'breaking news' story is the genesis.