rocknthefreeworld
Member
Less didn't know the difference and more type like I do where random shit gets capitalized because my pinkies are slower than hell now.Lol, you guys make me laugh. Like I don't know the f'ing difference. 5MB/s.
Less didn't know the difference and more type like I do where random shit gets capitalized because my pinkies are slower than hell now.Lol, you guys make me laugh. Like I don't know the f'ing difference. 5MB/s.
Yeah typically 5000’ is the max, a lot of areas served by a DSLAM have been converted to a VRAD and using “bonded pairs” to get upwards of 15-mbpsDSL is garbage for a lot of people they sell it to. It 100% depends on distance. Anything past 1 mile from the DSLAM can start showing horrible drops in speed. So usually it is only good in populated areas or those close to where they think a DSLAM is profitable.
To give you the condensed version:Another full bunch of conversations that i find my self totally....lost on!!!!!!!?
5MBs...DSLAM...DSL rocks a .3 Mbps upload ( really!) .... etc
DSL is a relic unless you are in rural areas.
I wish AT&T thought something of our area. We have three providers. Two have Gigabit. AT&T offers us 5 Mbit. Seriously. And people still subscribe to them even though you can get 100 Mbit from the others for the same price.I am running on a PFP with at&t at 300mbps. However I’m building a new house and will lose that. Trying to sweet talk some engineers and planners to get some fiber (pfp) placed. The at&t U-verse internet is really the best thing going right now. My brother get a full gig at his place
Yeah, the sky pollution is pronounced, also curious how quickly the rates will kick up once people get settled in with it. Amazon is planning a competitor low earth orbit array of satellites.Rural areas take it on the chin on internet. Either the service sucks or it is stupid expensive. Starlink is going to make a huge improvement for those of us with limited options while cluttering the sky with short term satellites.
Two questions. Does starlink have an option for a static ivp4 address? Some apps need ivp4. voip as an example. Is lightning an issue if mounted high on a pole?
CGNAT IPv4 only, with no option of static IP. There FAQ does say they plan to support it later.Two questions. Does starlink have an option for a static ivp4 address? Some apps need ivp4. voip as an example. Is lightning an issue if mounted high on a pole?
CGNAT has a lot of issues with this. Often you don't have one public IP anyway as they route you through different external internet connections based on a myriad of things. You might be seen to Google.com as one IP then RollTideBama.com as a completely different one.The public IP for Starlink changes extremely frequently.
Wonder if it passes cloudflare security issues. Ddos attacks have made business sites very very security paranoidCGNAT has a lot of issues with this. Often you don't have one public IP anyway as they route you through different external internet connections based on a myriad of things. You might be seen to Google.com as one IP then RollTideBama.com as a completely different one.
As long as Starlinks external IP are not being used for DDOS activity it would pass Cloudflare. I know for sure that some folks are using Cloudflare Tunnels to allow access externally to their systems and/or host sites while on Starlink, which I expect they would stop if the external IP were on a list at Cloudflare.Wonder if it passes cloudflare security issues. Ddos attacks have made business sites very very security paranoid
I sure see none around here ...and we are rural...big time..Wifi is just a stepping stone. The cellular carriers could own the access if they really tried. There are a few companies around here buying fiber access in a neighborhood and deploying private wifi. They build a tower or rent space. The risk vs profit is high. Our government is granting money for rural areas but I don't see companies jumping on it....JMHO Starlink is the future but has a way to go.