Crimson&WhiteGecko
Member
Isn’t it the offense’s job to capitalize on turnovers?
While defensive scoring is exciting and I’m all for it, it actually is detrimental. When the defense scores, who is next on the field? The defense. The offense gets a long rest, but the defense gets tired. Tired leads to injuries. It’s actually better if the defense gets the ball, advances it, and then give it to the offense.I can apply to sides of the ball. . . . .
For instance, Wommack wants us stripping the ball away on sacks & certainly recovering the ball. He also wants us scoring more with turnovers.
Understand the concept but it really depends. If the take away is on first or second down of the possession it didn't really add a lot of time for the d on the field.While defensive scoring is exciting and I’m all for it, it actually is detrimental. When the defense scores, who is next on the field? The defense. The offense gets a long rest, but the defense gets tired. Tired leads to injuries. It’s actually better if the defense gets the ball, advances it, and then give it to the offense.
Best example of that is the 2012 SECCG against UGA. UGA's defense is gassed when they force Bama to attempt a FG. Which is blocked and returned for a TD, giving UGA a 21-10 lead. UGA's gassed defense goes back on the field and 26 plays later, with Bama running 23 of them, Bama goes up 24-21.While defensive scoring is exciting and I’m all for it, it actually is detrimental. When the defense scores, who is next on the field? The defense. The offense gets a long rest, but the defense gets tired. Tired leads to injuries. It’s actually better if the defense gets the ball, advances it, and then give it to the offense.
While defensive scoring is exciting and I’m all for it, it actually is detrimental. When the defense scores, who is next on the field? The defense. The offense gets a long rest, but the defense gets tired. Tired leads to injuries. It’s actually better if the defense gets the ball, advances it, and then give it to the offense.
As usual, it depends. When Langham intercepted and scored there was less than four minutes to play in the game. But imagine if you have a dominant defense that turns the ball over and scores, repeatedly. Unless you have tremendous depth, the defense will wear down.Are you actually suggesting that anytime the defense scores a touchdown, instead of the offense is BAD?
If so, agree to disagree on that one... I mean the Antonio Langham interception for a TD in the first SECCG was a bad thing?
Well, if it's Bama, and they're up 60-0 in the 4th Quarter, I'd still feel pretty comfortable.As usual, it depends. When Langham intercepted and scored there was less than four minutes to play in the game. But imagine if you have a dominant defense that turns the ball over and scores, repeatedly. Unless you have tremendous depth, the defense will wear down.
Bama had two 2 play scoring drives, not much different imo. In a perfect game the offense has long sustained drives ending with points and the d provides a lot of 3 and outs but points are points, I'm good with however bama scores them.As usual, it depends. When Langham intercepted and scored there was less than four minutes to play in the game. But imagine if you have a dominant defense that turns the ball over and scores, repeatedly. Unless you have tremendous depth, the defense will wear down.
As usual, it depends. When Langham intercepted and scored there was less than four minutes to play in the game. But imagine if you have a dominant defense that turns the ball over and scores, repeatedly. Unless you have tremendous depth, the defense will wear down.
See post #6. There is a case where it probably cost UGA the football game.Are you actually suggesting that anytime the defense scores a touchdown, instead of the offense is BAD?
If so, agree to disagree on that one... I mean the Antonio Langham interception for a TD in the first SECCG was a bad thing?
We don’t play W Kentucky every week.Bama had two 2 play scoring drives, not much different imo. In a perfect game the offense has long sustained drives ending with points and the d provides a lot of 3 and outs but points are points, I'm good with however bama scores them.
I'm aware. My point is the same no matter who they play, an offense with big play capabilities puts you in the same position as the defense scoring.We don’t play W Kentucky every week.
See post #6. There is a case where it probably cost UGA the football game.
This is a stupid argument.