Rick in New York
Member
Alabama has a rich and very impressive history in college athletics...a LONG and impressive history that includes national championships and consistent major performance on the athletic field or in the arena.
No one is questioning that. Alabama is one of the premier programs in the country. No kissing a$$ here.
Utah on the other hand has national championships and multiple Final Four appearances. Its gymnastics teams are always ranked in the top 4 and MANY national championships. Alabama also has a first rate gymnastics program. I could go on but both teams having winning histories.
Utah has been playing college football for around 100 years. It has had some excellent teams.
No one is questioning the difference of day in and day out competition. It is not about population...it is about location.
I for one am glad to see Utah play Alabama. It is actually one of the more interesting bowl games and definitely the second most interesting BCS matchups.
I read stuff coming from Salt Lake City and much of it is defensive, however much of it is regarding respect.
Respect for Alabama (yeah...it is not all about dogging you) and lack of respect for Utah.
What I read here is a lot about dismissing the Utes out of hand. You have a lot ammunition to use. Difference in competition... difference in history in football, legendary names (let's face it, it does not get any more legendary than Bear Bryant).
Yet, it is not only football that makes a great program. The quality and level of players has changed dramatically in the last 10 years. I do not care what DI A school you come from, if you do not have a real gift, you are not going to be play or even recruited.
Utah has had some really quick and amazing players. Steve Smith from the Carolina Panthers comes to mind.
Actually many NFL players from the last 10 years.
Utah also has had some really excellent coaching staffs.
The only way the football question will be answered
(on many levels) will be at the game. Not the website dialogs and not by imagining that one team is amazingly better or worse than the other.
I think this is going to be an interesting game...a very interesting game.
The only thing that I find strange on this board is that The PAC 10 is dissed...the Big 10 is dissed, The Big East is dissed, the Mountain West is dissed, the ACC is dissed...independents are dissed... and even the Big 12 is dissed. It is rare but there is always some fan that believes that no competitive team exists outside of the SEC.
There are a ton of good players on any competitive team. I will tell you right now that you have a much better argument than anyone in the Mountain West Conference does. However, any team that gets this far has to be good.
The only answer is an inclusive playoff. 8 teams and not 4. Lose a couple of bogus Southwest Louisiana or Northern Arizona games and give that time to 4/2/1 extra playoff games. Yeah schools would lose some revenue but the competition at the end would be furious and would leave no doubt.
No one is questioning that. Alabama is one of the premier programs in the country. No kissing a$$ here.
Utah on the other hand has national championships and multiple Final Four appearances. Its gymnastics teams are always ranked in the top 4 and MANY national championships. Alabama also has a first rate gymnastics program. I could go on but both teams having winning histories.
Utah has been playing college football for around 100 years. It has had some excellent teams.
No one is questioning the difference of day in and day out competition. It is not about population...it is about location.
I for one am glad to see Utah play Alabama. It is actually one of the more interesting bowl games and definitely the second most interesting BCS matchups.
I read stuff coming from Salt Lake City and much of it is defensive, however much of it is regarding respect.
Respect for Alabama (yeah...it is not all about dogging you) and lack of respect for Utah.
What I read here is a lot about dismissing the Utes out of hand. You have a lot ammunition to use. Difference in competition... difference in history in football, legendary names (let's face it, it does not get any more legendary than Bear Bryant).
Yet, it is not only football that makes a great program. The quality and level of players has changed dramatically in the last 10 years. I do not care what DI A school you come from, if you do not have a real gift, you are not going to be play or even recruited.
Utah has had some really quick and amazing players. Steve Smith from the Carolina Panthers comes to mind.
Actually many NFL players from the last 10 years.
Utah also has had some really excellent coaching staffs.
The only way the football question will be answered
(on many levels) will be at the game. Not the website dialogs and not by imagining that one team is amazingly better or worse than the other.
I think this is going to be an interesting game...a very interesting game.
The only thing that I find strange on this board is that The PAC 10 is dissed...the Big 10 is dissed, The Big East is dissed, the Mountain West is dissed, the ACC is dissed...independents are dissed... and even the Big 12 is dissed. It is rare but there is always some fan that believes that no competitive team exists outside of the SEC.
There are a ton of good players on any competitive team. I will tell you right now that you have a much better argument than anyone in the Mountain West Conference does. However, any team that gets this far has to be good.
The only answer is an inclusive playoff. 8 teams and not 4. Lose a couple of bogus Southwest Louisiana or Northern Arizona games and give that time to 4/2/1 extra playoff games. Yeah schools would lose some revenue but the competition at the end would be furious and would leave no doubt.
