šŸˆ Did Auburn get away with cheating?

AFF

Member
It's at least good to see someone in the media calling attention to the the NCAA's selective reasoning.

By Dan Wetzel, Yahoo! Sports
Sep 24, 1:05 am EDT
.....
In 2006, Auburn sociology professor Jim Gundlach detailed a case of academic fraud to The New York Times. Athletes, mostly football players, were flocking to a ā€œdirected-readingā€ program run by a professor notorious for handing out A’s while requiring little to no class work.
.....
ā€œWe (had) people who couldn’t put together complete sentences going out there saying they had a sociology degree from Auburn University,ā€ Gundlach said.
.....
This time, the NCAA went by the letter of the law. All those football players taking the easy class were considered a coincidence. Receiving A’s while doing no work merely was a secondary violation. The NCAA turned out easier to pass than sociology.
.....
ā€œI had this notion that the NCAA did care about athletes being students, too,ā€ Gundlach said. ā€œThat’s a myth. They only care about money. (The enforcement process) is primarily used as PR to maintain the tax-exempt status of big-time college athletics.ā€

For blowing the whistle Gundlach said he was ā€œharassedā€ within the department and community. It caused him to retire early and after the NCAA’s empty decision, he wishes he never tried to take on Auburn football.

ā€œIt’s just impossible for a single individual (to fight).ā€

Recently a professor at a different school uncovered similar academic fraud on his campus. He called Gundlach and asked whether he should step forward.

ā€œUnless you’re ready to retire,ā€ Gundlach told him, ā€œjust let it slide.ā€

Mash below for full article:

NCAA naps during golden age of cheating
 
I'll say this for the NCAA. They also did nothing when a very similar situation involving the psychology department at Michigan, and they didn't do anything to Michigan either.
 
Back
Top Bottom